TV licences: BBC to go ahead with over-75s licence fee changes.

TV licences: BBC to go ahead with over-75s licence fee changes.

9th July 2020

                 GETTY IMAGES

The BBC is to go ahead with a plan to end free TV licences for most over-75s, after a two-month delay because of the coronavirus pandemic.

That means more than three million households will be asked to start paying the £157.50 fee from 1 August.

Only those who receive the Pension Credit benefit will be exempt.

The BBC said the new scheme is “the fairest decision”, but the government said it was “the wrong decision” and Age UK called it “a kick in the teeth”.

Why has this decision been taken?

The controversial change was originally due to be made on 1 June, and the BBC said the delay had cost £35m a month.

The cost of continuing to provide free licences to all over-75s could have reached £1bn a year over time with an ageing population, according to the corporation.

Do I need a TV licence and what does it pay for?

BBC Chairman Sir David Clementi said the decision had “not been easy”, but the broadcaster is under “under severe financial pressure” and a further delay would have had an impact on programmes.

                      Ricky Tomlinson led a protest outside the BBC’s n Salford last June

BBC delays over-75 TV licence fee changes.

The BBC has previously warned that making no changes would have led to “unprecedented closures” of services.

It has also previously said it must make an extra £125m savings this year as a result of the pandemic, including the cost of delaying the over-75s changes.

Free TV licences for the over-75s have been provided by the government since 2000, but responsibility for the provision was passed to the BBC as part of its last licence fee settlement.

What has the reaction been?

The Age UK charity said it was “bitterly disappointed”, describing the move as “a kick in the teeth for millions of over-75s who have had a torrid time during this crisis”.

More than 630,000 people signed an Age UK petition when the BBC first announced the plan in 2019. The charity has now urged the BBC and the government to “urgently sit down and agree on a solution to keep TV licences free”.

Age UK charity director Caroline Abrahams said many older people would either have to give up their TV, which is “more of a lifeline than ever”, or other essential purchases.

“Everyone needs to understand that under the BBC’s scheme many hundreds of thousands of the poorest pensioners will be facing a bill they will simply be unable to afford to pay,” she said.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesman said the BBC had made the “wrong decision”, and the government believes the licence fees in question “should be funded by the BBC”.

Culture minister Matt Warman said the move was “deeply frustrating”.

But Labour’s shadow culture secretary Jo Stevens said: “The refusal of the government to fund this vital service after promising to do so is nothing short of betrayal.

“Many over-75s have spent months at home with TV providing an invaluable source of company during the pandemic. For the government to blame the BBC who are having to contend with huge cuts is simply passing the buck.”

Julian Knight MP, Conservative chairman of the House of Commons culture select committee, called the situation “a mess” and said the new regime would be “a body blow to millions of British pensioners”.

                       JULIANKNIGHT15

Broadcaster and Labour peer Dame Joan Bakewell said some older people could and should pay – but there is a “suffering middle” who will struggle.

“The rich old have lots of savings and investments, and they can well afford it,” she told BBC Radio 5 Live.

But she added: “Not enough will get it free. There are layers of people above the earning [level] that gets you the benefit who also should be allowed to have a free licence fee… It’s the suffering middle who perhaps find life expensive but are not reduced to needing state benefits.”

She added that she had hoped incoming director general Tim Davie could have brought “some original thinking” to find a better solution.

How will the new system work?

The BBC said there would be a “Covid-safe” payment system, meaning people can apply online, and there will be a dedicated phone line and support staff.

“No-one needs to take any immediate action, or leave their home, to claim for a free TV licence or pay for one,” a statement said.

TV Licensing will write to all licence holders aged over 75 with clear guidance about how to pay, it said.

Almost 1.6 million people claim Pension Credit, according to the latest government figures. Of those, 450,000 have already applied for a free licence.

This shoddy decision to end free TV licences for most over-75s will haunt the BBC’s fat cat bosses.

By STEPHEN GLOVER FOR THE DAILY MAIL

9th July 2020 

So the deed is done. But will the BBC pay a price for going ahead with its plan to end free TV licences for most over-75s after a two-month stay of execution because of the Covid-19 pandemic?

The Corporation’s panjandrums evidently think they can get away with it. 

They will reason that, although more than three million households will have to start paying the £157.50 annual licence fee from August 1, some 1.6million of the very poorest pensioners claiming Pension Credit won’t have to fork out.

But, of course, many of the three million households forced to cough up are far from rich. 

The free TV licence for over-75s will be means-tested from August 1, meaning more than three million households will be asked to start paying the £157.50 fee

Compared with the BBC’s overpaid stars and lavishly remunerated senior executives, a lot of these elderly pensioners are poor. Paying the licence fee will hurt.

That is why Age UK, which inspired more than 630,000 people to sign a petition against the proposals when they were first announced last year, described the announcement as ‘a kick in the teeth for millions of over-75s who have had a torrid time during this crisis’.

Was there another way? You bet there was. Although it is forever boasting about trimming its sails, the Beeb is a vast, extravagant monster that has grown crazily over the past three decades, spawning new television channels and radio stations and a huge website. Its annual income is a massive £5billion.

Making three million pensioner households pay the licence fee should allow it to bank about a tenth of this amount. If Auntie had really cared about these people, this money could have been found through a serious process of economising.

The government has provided free TV licences for the over-75s since 2000, but responsibility for the provision now rests with the BBC.

Just cutting the salaries of hundreds of stars and senior managers earning more than £150,000 by 10 per cent would, by my rough calculations, yield £5million a year. It would be a symbolic step, which showed that despite appearances the ethos of public service broadcasting is still alive.

Much bigger sums could be found by closing down BBC4 (£44million) and Radio 6 Music (£12million). Shaving BBC1’s budget by just 10 per cent would yield £110million, and slimming down BBC2 by the same proportion nearly £40million. Auntie could reverse its idiotic decision to spend £100million on ‘diversity’ over the next three years.

In no time at all, an organisation which chose to put poorer pensioners before its immediate financial needs could save hundreds of millions of pounds if it really set its mind to it. But no such root-and-branch operation has taken place. Let the poor pensioners pay.

I accept that in 2015 the then chancellor, George Osborne, drove a hard bargain when he got the director-general, Tony Hall, to agree that the Corporation would take responsibility for the £745million annual cost of providing free TV licences for those aged 75 or over.

Lord Hall, who is just about to step down, caved in too easily. One of his predecessors, Mark Thompson, has claimed that he had begun writing a resignation letter when Osborne tried to impose similar costs on the BBC five years earlier.

The fact remains that the Beeb agreed to these terms, and is now acting in a ruthless and self-serving manner. If it did not know that withdrawing free licences will be painful for many pensioners, it wouldn’t have suspended the measure during the pandemic.

In March, Lord Hall agreed in front of a Commons committee that people in their 80s and 90s could be hauled through the courts for not paying their TV licences after the free concession is withdrawn. How will our public service broadcaster with its hundreds of ‘fat cat’ salaries look then?

BBC bosses assume they have won this battle. I believe that, on the contrary, they have exposed themselves to the charge of meanness and selfishness, and that this shoddy decision may come back to haunt them. 

BBC’s free TV license blow to pensioners: Over-75s will have to pay £157 fee from next month.

BY PAUL REVOIR MEDIA EDITOR FOR THE DAILY MAIL 

The BBC was yesterday accused of kicking pensioners in the teeth by axing free TV licences for millions of over-75s.

The Corporation announced it will bring in its controversial new scheme in three weeks’ time, on August 1.

More than three million households – those not claiming Pension Credit – will be hit with the £157.50 fee.

BBC chiefs had initially planned to charge them from last month but delayed the start due to the coronavirus pandemic. Yesterday it confirmed there would be no further postponement.

The BBC, based at Portland Place, London, made the announcement today but has faced a fierce backlash

The cost of continuing to provide free licences to all over-75s could have reached £1billion a year with an ageing population.

The BBC’s chairman, Sir David Clementi, claimed the Corporation could not continue delaying the introduction ‘without impacting programmes and services’.

Age UK, which has led the fight against the plans, said it feared for the mental health of older people living on their own if they have to give up their TV set.

Director Caroline Abrahams said: ‘We’re bitterly disappointed by this decision on behalf of the millions of over-75s who have had a torrid time over the last few months and for whom this must feel like another kick in the teeth, during a terrible year.

‘Many older people on low incomes have told us that if they have to find £150-plus a year to pay for a licence then they will have to forego some other essential, or try to survive without TV at all.’

She criticised the ‘flawed design’ of the scheme saying two in five of all the pensioners on the lowest incomes do not get Pension Credit ‘even though they are entitled to it’. 

But she said the ‘principal responsibility’ for the situation lay with government after it ‘transferred’ the scheme to the BBC.

Tory MP Julian Knight, who is chairman of the digital, culture, media and sport committee, said: ‘At what is already a very difficult time, this will be a body blow to millions of British pensioners.

‘I had hoped that the previous delay announced would lead to the Government and BBC coming together in order to thrash out a fresh deal. However, that has clearly not happened.’ 

The proposals sparked outrage when they were announced last year, with more than 630,000 people signing a petition set up by the charity Age UK, calling for action to be taken.

He said the ‘mess’ was the result of a ‘poor decision’ by outgoing director general Lord Hall and that ‘now Britain’s pensioners are having to pick up the cost’.

Boris Johnson’s spokesman said the PM disagreed with the move. He said: ‘This is the wrong decision. We recognise the value of free TV licences for over-75s and believe that they should be funded by the BBC.’ 

Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said: ‘I very much regret the decision that the BBC has taken. We gave the settlement to the BBC back in 2015. They said that it was a good settlement, and I regret that they couldn’t find efficiency savings in order to avoid having to impose the licence fee on the over-75s in the way that they have set out.’ 

Sir David Clementi admitted that while about 1.5million households could get free licences if on Pension Credit, only 450,000 of those eligible had applied. 

The move provoked a swathe of criticism, with the likes of Dame Helen Mirren calling the end of the universal entitlement ‘heart-breaking’

There had been concerns that if pensioners were forced to go out and copy documents needed to qualify for the scheme, it could put lives at risk with coronavirus still circulating. 

But the BBC said the implementation of the scheme will be ‘Covid-19 safe’ with no pensioners needing to leave their homes to claim for the free TV licence or to pay for one.

TV Licensing, which runs its collection activities, will write to those affected and give them ‘clear guidance’. 

Telephone contact centres have also been set up to assist. The Corporation claims without the new fee, it would have had to close BBC2, BBC4, the BBC News channel, Radio 5 Live, the BBC Scotland channel and a number of local radio stations.

This shoddy decision to end free TV licences for most over-75s will haunt the BBC’s fat cat bosses.

Rebel pensioners reveal plan to derail attempt to strip them of free TV licences.

Rebel pensioners reveal plan to derail attempt to strip them of free TV licences.

EXCLUSIVE: The Silver Voices campaign group wants to “gum up the works” as over-75s face losing their entitlement to the benefit.

BY

Ben Glaze Deputy Political Editor – Daily Mirror.

11TH JULY 2020

Millions of OAPs face losing their free licences.

What is really going on in politics? 

REBEL TV LICENCE ALLIANCE.

OAPs’ direct action against lost perk.• Daily Mirror• 11 Jul 2020• BY BEN GLAZE Deputy Political Editor – Daily Mirror.

PENSIONERS have vowed to take direct action against plans to strip them of free TV licences.

The Silver Voices campaign group said it plans to “gum up the works” of the TV licensing system.

Director Dennis Reed yesterday confirmed it would launch the campaign within weeks, after the BBC said it would end free licences for over-75s who do not receive Pension Credit from August 1.

Labour is expected to try to force a Minister to the Commons next week to be grilled by MPs, after the Tories broke a 2017 manifesto pledge to protect the perk until at least 2022.

Furious OAPs will trigger moves to try to hamper the administration of the TV licensing system.

The plot – first revealed by the Mirror six weeks ago – will see all over-60s urged to stop 

Direct Debit payments to pay the licence fee.

It is aimed at making the cost of administering and enforcing the licence fee “much more expensive than keeping the free licence for a relatively small group”.

Mr Dennis Reed said last night: “With the confirmation the BBC will be ending free TV licences for the over-75s from August 1, Silver Voices will implement its ‘gum up the works’ direct action from that date.

“Silver Voices is calling for all over-60s to take action to support the over-75s. From August 1, all over60s in the UK will be asked to withdraw from Direct Debits and standing orders, and advise TV Licensing they will only settle their licence fees by cheque or cash and post in future.

“Guidelines will also be issued on ‘creative but legal’ ways to complicate payments further.

“The intention will be to increase the costs of collection and enforcement to such a level that the Government and BBC will be forced to rethink this cruel policy.”

An estimated 3.7 million over-75s who currently receive free licences will have to pay £157.50 a year to watch. The Mirror has campaigned to save the benefit, with more than 18,000 readers backing the fight.

The Conservatives pledged at the 2017 election to protect free licences for the rest of that Parliament, which was due to run until 2022.

But the BBC had already been handed responsibility for funding the lifeline from June, under a deal agreed in FEE PROTEST Dennis Reed 2015. The move was delayed by two months because of the pandemic.

The Beeb says keeping licences free for all over-75s would cost £745million by 2021-22. The restrictions mean only over-75s who receive Pension Credit will be eligible.

Campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen accused the Government of trying to “shift blame” on to the BBC. She said: “My main criticism is for the politicians. I think Oliver Dowden [Culture Secretary], who said he felt let down by the BBC, was shifting blame.

“It was Gordon Brown who decided to make this gift of free television licences and it was George Osborne who took it away and said the Government would no longer fund it. And that’s what feels like a slap in the face to older people.”

Labour peer Lord Foulkes, who chairs Parliament’s cross-party group for ageing and older people, said: “For many who rely on their TV for information, entertainment and company, this has been a deadly blow.”

unsubscribe at any time.

Rebel pensioners who face being stripped of free TV licences tonight unveiled a “gum up the works” campaign aimed at hampering plans to axe their benefit.

Some 3.7 million OAPs are due to lose the lifeline, worth £157.50 a year, from August 1.

Curbs on entitlement were due to come into force on Monday, but were delayed by two months because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Older people’s groups are demanding a further stay of execution – and called on the Tories to honour a 2017 manifesto pledge to protect free licences for over-75s.

Silver Voices director Dennis Reed said: “June 1 was the original date to implement this cruel policy but it has only been delayed until August 1.

Actor Ricky Tomlinson has led protests against plans to axe free TV licences for most over-75s.

“It is callous in the extreme for the Government to leave this threat hanging over the heads of vulnerable and isolated senior citizens as the coronavirus crisis continues.

“The charities are reporting increased mental health concerns over the indefinite lockdown for older people and the TV is often the only means for us to keep in touch with reality.”

Silver Voices is writing to BBC director-general Lord Hall warning that unless the implementation date is delayed again, a “non-cooperation” campaign dubbed “gum up the works” will kick off on August 1.

BBC director-general Lord Tony Hall.

Initially, all over-60s will be urged to stop Direct Debit payments to pay the licence fee, and tell the BBC that in future they will only correspond with TV Licensing by post, and only pay by cheque.

Mr Reed said the drive was aimed at making make the cost of administering and enforcing the licence fee “much more expensive than keeping the free licence for a relatively small group”.

The Conservatives pledged at the 2017 election to protect over-75s’ free licences for the rest of that Parliament, which was due to run until 2022.

But the BBC had already been handed responsibility for funding the lifeline from June 2020, under a deal agreed in 2015.

The corporation is restricting eligibility to over-75s who receive Pension Credit.

It says keeping licences free for all would cost £745million by 2021-22.

Mr Reed hopes the mini-revolt will pile pressure on the Government to reverse its decision.

He added: “We are fed up to the back teeth about this continuing disrespect for older people and the time is right to turn the screw on the Government to keep its promises.”

Bectu broadcasting union head Philippa Childs said: “This potential action demonstrates how important it is for the Government to take responsibility for the cost of the licence fee for over-75s.

“The BBC should never had been forced to take the difficult decision about how free licence fees for the over-75s should continue to be offered.

“By forcing this recognised welfare benefit on to the BBC, the Government is shirking its responsibility towards this vulnerable group of people who in the current climate need access to it more than ever.

“The policy must be handled by the Government so that the BBC is able to focus on what it does best which is educating, informing and entertaining the nation.”

Lord Foulkes, co-chairman of Westminster’s cross-party group for ageing and older people, backed the campaign.

Labour peer Lord George Foulkes will raise the issue in the House of Lords.

The Labour peer, 78, will raise the TV licences row in House of Lords on Tuesday.

He said: “I fully support Silver Voices in their campaign.

“It underlines the real anxiety and anger felt by many older people and those who support them, which has been caused by the Government’s decision to renege on a clear manifesto promise.

“There is now extensive opposition to the withdrawal of free TV licences for over-75s.

“The Government therefore must put a stop to this by honouring their manifesto promise to older people and saving this valuable benefit indefinitely.”

Age UK charity director Caroline Abrahams said: “The BBC Board’s decision to delay rollout of their planned scheme was very welcome but it is becoming more obvious with every day that the initial two-month delay was not nearly long enough.

Age UK charity director Caroline Abrahams.

“Age UK is calling for the pause to last until at least the end of 2020.

“So many events and initiatives are being scrapped this year and with so many older people still stuck largely or solely at home, this should go the same way.”

The Mirror is campaigning to permanently save the benefit, with more than 18,000 readers backing the fight by completing coupons in the paper.

Boris Johnson has previously urged the BBC to “cough up” and save free licences.

Outgoing BBC boss Lord Hall has blamed the Government for axing the benefit.

Millions of pensioners betrayed with ‘kick in the teeth’ as free TV licence axed.

Millions of pensioners betrayed with ‘kick in the teeth’ as free TV licence axed.

The BBC has said there will not be an extension to a two-month stay-of-execution, meaning 3.7m pensioners will have to pay the £157.50 yearly fee from1st August 2020.

BY

Ben Glaze – Deputy Political Editor Daily Mirror

and Nicola Methven

10TH JULY 2020

Ricky Tomlinson joins protestors outside BBC Media City at the broadcaster’s decision to axe free TV licences for 3.7 million pensioners.

What is really going on in politics? 

Millions of pensioners will have their free TV licence stripped from them on August 1.

An estimated 3.7 million over-75s who currently receive the benefit will now have to pay the £157.50 yearly fee.

The BBC said there will be no extension to a two-month stay-of-execution triggered by the pandemic.

The Tories, who had promised to safeguard the lifeline, have been blasted for “betraying” pensioners.

Age UK charity director Caroline Abrahams said: “We’re bitterly disappointed on behalf of the millions of over-75s who have had a torrid time over the last few months and for whom this must feel like another kick in the teeth.

Mirror columnist Paul Routledge addresses a ‘Save the TV Licence’ rally at Westminster.

Peers issue fresh calls for Government to save free TV licences for over-75s.

“Many older people on low incomes have told us that if they have to find £150-plus a year to pay for a licence they will have to forego some other essential, or try to survive without TV at all.

“We worry about the mental health of older people living on their own if they have to give up their cherished TV. For some it’s all they have and their main way of alleviating chronic loneliness.”

BBC chairman Sir David Clementi said: “The BBC could not continue delaying the scheme without impacting on programmes and services.”

The Tories pledged in 2017 to protect free licences for the rest of that Parliament, which was due to run until 2022.

But the BBC had already been handed responsibility for funding the benefit from 2020, under a deal agreed in 2015.

The Daily Mirror started a campaign to save millions of TV licences in 2018.

     Labour leader Keir Starmer backs calls to save free TV licences for over 75s

Keir Starmer pokes fun at Dominic Cummings with cheeky beer photo.

The Corporation says keeping licences free for all over-75s would cost £745million annually by 2021-22.

Bosses have decided that only those who receive Pension Credit – a benefit for the poorest pensioners – will be eligible. It means roughly 3.7 million over-75s are expected to miss out.

The BBC said about 1.5 million households may still get a free TV licence and that 450,000 have already applied.

The Mirror has campaigned to save the lifeline – supported by the likes of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, ex-Strictly judge Len Goodman and actor Ricky Tomlinson.

Boris Johnson, who vowed in 2017 to protect free licences, has again blamed the BBC. The PM’s spokesman said yesterday: “This is the wrong decision.

Len Goodman backed the campaign.

Free TV licences campaigners step up fight ahead of showdown in Parliament

TV ‘even more important during lockdown’, say OAPs braced to lose free licences

We recognise the value of free TV licences for over-75s and believe they should be funded by the BBC.”

But campaigners have accused the Tories of passing the buck.

Age UK said that while the BBC had made the decision, “the principal responsibility lies with the Government”.

Shadow Culture Secretary Jo Stevens said: “The refusal of the Government to fund this vital service after promising to do so is nothing short of betrayal.

“For the Government to blame the BBC who are having to contend with huge cuts is simply passing the buck.” Dennis Reed, director of campaign group Silver Voices, called the BBC board “stone-hearted” and compared Mr Johnson to Pontius Pilate.

Mr Reed added: “If the Government gets away with scrapping this universal benefit, winter fuel allowances will be next, followed by the [pensions] triple lock and free prescriptions.

Age UK charity director Caroline Abrahams said she is ‘bitterly disappointed’.

Dementia-hit OAPs ‘could suffer worst from TV licence removal’, fear  campaigners

Government should fund free TV licences for over-75s, say majority of pensioners

“TV [is] the main companion for millions. To put this lifeline under threat at this time is the height of cruelty.” The Bectu broadcasting union said: “The BBC has been put in an impossible position by the Government, and is already cutting talented staff and much-loved programmes.

“It is the Government who should be funding this benefit.”

The GMB union said the Tories “have double-crossed millions of pensioners”. While Labour peer Lord Foulkes has vowed to fight on.

Tory MP Julian Knight said: “At what is a very difficult time, this will be a body blow to millions of pensioners.

Jo Stevens says the decision is ‘nothing short of a betrayal’

Ministers ‘should be worried’ about OAPs’ plan to disrupt TV licence fee system.

“I hoped the previous delay would lead to the Government and BBC coming together to thrash out a fresh deal. That has clearly not happened.” The licence fee cut comes despite the Government spending billions to lessen the economic impact of the coronavirus crisis.

In March, Chancellor Rishi Sunak unveiled a £350billion package and this week announced a £30bn boost.

A BBC insider said that while the Corporation agreed to take on responsibility for the policy five years ago, it never committed to keep funding it.

The source said “that was never an option”, adding that the two-month delay to scrapping free licences “has already cost £70million – and that’s on top of the £125million of savings we need to find because of coronavirus”.

The insider said: “Our financial circumstances have changed significantly for the worse since this plan was announced a year ago.

“The only alternative to not pushing ahead with it would be to say goodbye to BBC2, BBC4, the BBC news channel, Radio 5 Live, BBC Scotland and several local radio stations.”

This treachery won’t be forgotten by us..• Daily Mirror• 10 Jul 2020• BY PAUL R0UTLEDGE.

BATTLE MAKING A STAND Actor RickyTomlinson at protest last year.

Mirror story in 2018 huge cuts is simply passing the buck.” Dennis Reed, director of campaign group Silver Voices, called the BBC board “stone-hearted” and compared Mr Johnson to Pontius Pilate.

Mr Reed added: “If the Government gets away with scrapping this universal benefit, winter fuel allowances will be next, followed by the [pensions] triple lock and free prescriptions.

“TV [is] the main companion for millions. To put this lifeline under threat at this time is the height of cruelty.” The Bectu broadcasting union said: “The BBC has been put in an impossible position by the Government, and is already cutting talented staff and much-loved programmes.

“It is the Government who should be funding this benefit.”

The GMB union said the Tories “have double-crossed millions of pensioners”. While Labour peer Lord Foulkes has vowed to fight on.

Tory MP Julian Knight said: “At what is a very difficult time, this will be a body blow to millions of pensioners.

“I hoped the previous delay would lead to the Government and BBC coming together to thrash out a fresh deal. That has clearly not happened.” The licence fee cut comes despite the

Government spending billions to lessen the economic impact of the coronavirus crisis.

In March, Chancellor Rishi Sunak unveiled a £350billion package and this week announced a £30bn boost.

A BBC insider said that while the Corporation agreed to take on responsibility for the policy five years ago, it never committed to keep funding it.

The source said “that was never an option”, adding that the two-month delay to scrapping free licences “has already cost £70m – and that’s on top of the £125m of savings we need to find because of coronavirus”.

The insider said: “Our financial circumstances have changed significantly for the worse since this plan was announced a year ago.

“The only alternative to not pushing ahead with it would be to say goodbye to BBC2, BBC4, the BBC news channel, Radio 5 Live, BBC Scotland and several local radio stations.”

BILLIONS here, billions there, Rishi Sunak threw money like confetti at a wedding to business, employers and the opera.

But the cowardly Chancellor delayed the Tory betrayal of pensioners for 24 hours.

Rich Rishi didn’t dare mention it in his mini-Budget because he knew it would spoil his big day.

This is how it looks to us oldies: Thatcher was the milk-snatcher. Sunak is the licence-snatcher.

Only yesterday could the BBC confirm that free TV licences for most over-75s will end in three weeks’ time.

Three million folk will have to fork out a week’s pension every year to fund their friend in the corner.

Too many already have to choose between heating and eating. All charities for the aged agree the telly has been crucial for the elderly during lockdown. It is our lifeline to the outside world – sometimes the only contact.

And if, God forbid, there is a second wave of Covid-19, it will coincide with the deprivation of this vital link.

This is not the fault of the Beeb. It is the toxic legacy of multi-millionaire George Osborne, who forced the cash-strapped BBC to accept financial responsibility.

Chancellor Sunak had one last opportunity to put this scandal right two days ago, and he deliberately, wilfully and arrogantly failed to take it. You can see I’m angry.

For me, this is personal. In 1968, I was fined £4 by a Marylebone stipendiary magistrate for using a wireless without a licence. It isn’t an offence now, and it was an oversight then. I had just moved to London, and didn’t have a TV so I didn’t get a licence that would have covered my old Bakelite radio.

I never made the same mistake again. Honest, m’lud.

Since then, I’ve paid thousands of pounds to watch the telly. I finally got my Gordon Brown free licence in December 2018. Twenty months later, the Tories are taking it away. Some furious oldies have said they will defy the detector van. This is serious. Failure to buy a licence will lead to fines and even imprisonment. A generation of pensioners faces the choice of kow-towing to the Government, or getting a criminal record in old age.

This latest treachery will go down badly with my generation. Remember, we turn out at election time.

Some Tories realise this is a vote loser. Julian Knight MP, chairman of the Commons Culture Committee, moaned that his Chancellor’s parsimony would be “a body blow” to pensioners.

It should also be a kick in the ballots. I urge readers to write to their MP to denounce this betrayal of the Conservatives’ promise to retain pension benefits.

If they can spend a million quid on painting Boris Johnson’s plane, and dole out billions to bosses they can afford to keep our licences. They could make a political soap out of this scandal: “Get stuffed, Minister!”

Only we won’t be able to watch it.

PAUL ROUTLEDGE ON VITAL LINK TV PROVIDES

DEMO Elderly are ready to fight.

It is our lifeline to the world, sometimes the only contact.

Royal Mail Customer Service Points (CSPs)/Callers Offices and Reception Areas – Coronavirus Covid-19 Health and Safety – Installation of Screens to Support Social Distancing Standards: 37

Royal Mail Customer Service Points (CSPs)/Callers Offices and Reception Areas – Coronavirus Covid-19 Health and Safety – Installation of Screens to Support Social Distancing Standards: 37

This LTB is to update Branches, Regions, Divisions and Area Health and Safety Reps on the information published in LTB No. 324/20and No. 334/20 on the installation of screens in Mail Centre and Delivery Office Customer Service Points (CSPs)/Callers Offices and Reception Areas.

Please see the attached updated spreadsheet which lists the office locations listed for a screen to be installed over a three-week programme which is now underway.

Following further discussions between the CWU Health, Safety & Environment Department and Royal Mail HQ and Royal Mail Property and Facilities Solutions, seven additional offices have now been identified as requiring the screen and have been added to the installation programmes.

The 7 CSPs/Callers Offices Units added to the original project list are:

  • West End DO
  • Eastleigh DO
  • Hayle DO
  • Nailsea DO
  • West London DO
  • Grimsby DO
  • Doncaster DO

The latest position on installation is within the attachment to this LTB.  118 units were initially identified as requiring screens based on a provisional list drawn up by Royal Mail Property and Facilities Solutions which was checked by RM Safety, Health and Environment Business Partners.

The current, total number of offices due for screen installations is 125 Units (this is with the 7 additional units above added) and 23 of the 125 are being fitted into Mail Centres/Plants. These offices have now been identified by Royal Mail where screens are required to improve safety, infection control and reduce risks in CSPs across the estate.

The remaining units not listed have been confirmed as having a security/bandit screen already in place.

With respect to a number of smaller Delivery Offices, alternative 739 item handover arrangements and areas are in place, such as stable doors, hatches, gates and some offices have no facilities in place. These offices have been subject to discussion with Royal Mail in order to ensure local site-specific Coronavirus risk assessments take place and are updated to ensure local controls are in place to maintain social distancing requirements and staff safety.

In order to obtain a level of assurance for all, it has been agreed that Royal Mail SHE Business Partners in consultation with CWU ASRs will undertake a joint review of the Risk Assessments and the controls, in the smaller delivery offices, of which 21 examples were identified and listed to Royal Mail HQ. It is agreed that Royal Mail will ensure that the local Unit Coronavirus/Covid-19 Risk Assessment contains the appropriate controls.

Would all ASRs check the position in respect of all offices in their Branch/postcode area constituencies and engage in discussions with the Royal Mail SHE Business Partners (Health and Safety Advisors).

All new screens are scheduled to be installed over a three-week period running from Monday 29 June 2020 to Friday 17 July 2020 as detailed in column ‘O’ of the attached spreadsheet.

In relation to Parcelforce offices, all depots have either fixed screens or temporary screens fitted to Customer Service Reception/Callers Office counters as well as key control lockers, where fixed screens where not already in place.

Yours sincerely,

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

LTB 373/20 – (CSPs) Coronavirus Covid-19 – Installation of Screens to Support Social Distancing Standards

CSP Without Screens List Final v5.03 (10.7.20)

POST OFFICE: ADMIN & SUPPLY CHAIN BONUS SCHEMES 2019/20

POST OFFICE: ADMIN & SUPPLY CHAIN BONUS SCHEMES 2019/20

Despite the fact we have a Collective Agreement and the bonus scheme is part of our members’ terms & conditions, there has been speculation on social media amongst our members as they are concerned the Post Office may seek to avoid its commitments to pay a bonus as a consequence of the £100m+ Horizon costs. As a result, discussions have been held recently and the following Joint Statement has been agreed and is being published today:

Joint Statement – Admin and Supply Chain bonus schemes 19/20

Although we are currently unable to confirm the Post Office financial performance results for 2019/20, Post Office and CWU want to give some assurances to all colleagues in Supply Chain and Admin with regards to bonus payments.

As soon as Post Office’s financial results have been confirmed, we will announce via a further joint statement the bonus payments. We anticipate this will be in the first week in August.
We would like to confirm that it is the intention to pay bonus in August salaries.

Lee Kelly                                                                                          Andy Furey
Employee Relations &                                                                Assistant Secretary
Policy Director                                                                             CWU

Hopefully the above JS will bring some degree of reassurance to our members.

Yours sincerely

Andy Furey
Assistant Secretary

LTB 372/20 – Post Office – Admin & Supply Chain Bonus Schemes 2019-20

Royal Mail Review of Future Catering Provision Tender Activity (Quadrant Joint Venture)

Royal Mail Review of Future Catering Provision Tender Activity (Quadrant Joint Venture)

Branches and representatives will recall that in August 2019 the department issued LTB 475/19 advising that the Royal Mail Board had taken the decision that the existing contract with Quadrant would not be automatically extended and that they intended to undertake a commercial tender process.

Royal Mail informed us that the tender process would commence in August – September 2019 and would follow three key stages:

1. August 19 – September 19 – Pre-Qualification Stage
2. September 19 – January 20 – Request for, and evaluation of, outline solutions stage 3. February 20 – April 20 – Request for Detailed Solutions

These phases were concluded and the company entered into detailed discussions in relation to the potential solutions submitted at Stage 3 and LTB 135/20 on Quadrant Pay issued on the 17th March 2020 confirmed that Compass Group/Quadrant had advanced to the latter stages of the tender process.

Clearly at that point the Covid-19 crisis had the potential to affect the timelines outlined and the department requested that the process be suspended due to the events, a request which Royal Mail rejected

Of course the pandemic has raised general concerns around job security and the department has been receiving a number of enquiries concerning the status of the tender activity, as our members are aware that the current Quadrant contract is due for renewal on the 1st October 2020.

Throughout the process the department’s priority has been to ensure that our Quadrant member’s long term job and standard of living security is protected and that they are fully supported. The issue of communication has been a constant issue with Royal Mail who have insisted on strict commercial confidentiality, even to the point where the Union were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement restricting our ability to consult or communicate with our members. We declined to sign the NDA and as a result detailed information around the tender has been withheld, though we have been updated periodically on the process.

Given the increasing levels of concern however the department have taken the decision to issue this communication, even though the current situation continues to restrict our ability to fully share information

and we have been unable to convince Royal Mail to release an update. At the time of preparing this LTB we understand that RM are in final contractual negotiations with the preferred bidder and that it is anticipated that the contract will be signed before the end of July 2020, at which point a formal announcement will be made.

Following the confirmation of the contract, any necessary discussions will take place between the department and the successful bidder in respect of any changes that are required going forward and Colleagues will of course be updated as to progress in this regard at the appropriate time.

However, to provide some assurance we anticipate that the new contract will be based on the current Catering Estate and provision of service to our Royal Mail Group members, notwithstanding the current Covid restrictions. While the nature of the service offering has been evolving over many years we do not anticipate that the continuity of employment of any Quadrant employee will be directly affected by any contract change.

Branches will be aware that Quadrant is currently the subject of a Joint Venture between Royal Mail and Compass Group, where Royal Mail are the senior partner. The department has sought ongoing commitments from Royal Mail in relation to this aspect and the implications should any new contract change the status of the Joint Venture. We have requested a meeting as a matter of urgency to progress these discussions.

In the meantime, we understand that the tender process has been a very unsettling time for our Quadrant members, who are understandably worried about their future employment. The restrictions on our ability to communicate have been extremely frustrating but it has been necessary to balance our wish to be open with the need to not undermine commercial discussions, which could prolong the period of uncertainty. The department are however hopeful that by the end of July 2020 there will be clearer understanding available, which will enable Quadrant members to make informed decisions going forward.

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to Davie Robertson, Assistant Secretary, email: dwyatt@cwu.org quoting reference: 311.02

Yours sincerely,

Davie Robertson
Assistant Secretary

LTB 371/20

Postal Department Industrial Training Update

Postal Department Industrial Training Update

Branches will be aware that prior to the outbreak of Covid-19 the Postal Department had embarked on Train the Trainer events in relation to the various one-day industrial training courses.  The aim of this initiative was to ensure that this training was delivered at pace by tutors/trainers who have live work experience in the relevant functions and business units.  In addition and through the Divisional Training Leads liaising with Branches, any knowledge or skills gaps would be identified so that as many existing and newly elected representatives as possible in Royal Mail Group including Parcelforce could then attend the various courses.

Branches will however appreciate that the Covid-19 pandemic has undoubtedly had a significant impact on both the demand for and deployment of the postal industrial training program.  Feedback that has been received from Postal Executive members through meetings held under the revised Divisional structure has however highlighted the need for postal industrial training to recommence in a format that takes account of the current restrictions.

This is of course a welcome development and illustrates that Field Officials and Branches are already setting out their priorities for the training and development of local representatives across the board.  There is likely to be ongoing limitations with regards to residential training given the current Government guidance on social distancing and it is difficult to predict the associated timescales.  There is therefore a need to develop a training plan utilising video technology that can be implemented both in the short-term and, if necessary, from the beginning of 2021.

Against this backdrop, the Postal Executive have met to consider the existing training challenges and to develop and deploy a hybrid modular training package that our existing trainers can present.  The details of this programme of work are summarised below:

  • A presentation-based training package is being developed to cover each of the main areas that currently make up the postal industrial training programme with the exception of resourcing.
  • Each session will be a maximum of 90 minutes duration and will be presented via video through the various packages at our disposal.
  • A training package will be set up on the use of a video conferencing system for the tutors/trainers prior to the launch of the video training programme.
  • A pilot of the video training package will be carried out in the North East Division and where possible members of the Postal Training Sub-Committee and Postal Executive will be able to observe the pilot programme in real time.
  • A full evaluation of the pilot will be undertaken by the Postal Education and Training Sub-Committee and a full presentation of the video training programme will be provided to the Postal Executive for their endorsement.
  • Once agreed, each Division will establish a training programme to be completed within a reasonable timeframe.

Additionally and in order to ensure that once this work is completed the training can be delivered at pace, the following measures will now be progressed by the current allocated Postal Executive member in line with their respective Divisional Training Lead:

  • Compile an up-to-date list of tutors/trainers identifying what areas they cover i.e. IR Framework, Conduct Code, Network etc. and if they are willing to continue to be part of the training team and undertake video training.  This activity should be completed by the 24th July.
  • Where it is recognised that gaps exist in the divisional training capability, additional tutors/trainers should be scoped and identified.  These colleagues will then receive support via a hybrid train the trainer package currently under development.

The video training package will be kept under review on an ongoing basis and amended accordingly in light of live working experience.

This training is in addition to the current residential Postal Procedures courses provided by the Education and Training Department and members of the Postal Department Sub-Committee are currently working with the E&T Department in order to review this material.

In closing, it cannot be disputed that recent events have resulted in a need for our industrial training packages to be redefined and modified.  The proposed course of action outlined above will however allow the Postal Department with the help of Divisions to ensure that high-quality industrial training continues to be delivered throughout the remainder of this year and possibly into 2021.  This will undoubtedly be a major support to new Representatives and I therefore hope that as this initiative develops, Branches will make the most of this opportunity to ensure as many unit Representatives as possible benefit from this training programme.

Any enquiries in relation to the content of this LTB should be addressed to the DGS(P) Department.

Yours sincerely,

Terry Pullinger

Deputy General Secretary (Postal)                           

LTB 370/20

POST OFFICE: COVID 19 – ENHANCED CLEANING: ZOONO FOGGING

POST OFFICE: COVID 19 – ENHANCED CLEANING: ZOONO FOGGING

I wish to inform Branches of a cleaning system called Fogging which is to be introduced into all workplaces (including CViT vans) where the Post Office provider Servest currently performs a clean. It will be conducted on a monthly basis and in addition to the regular cleaning schedule.

Fogging works by sanitising surface areas within buildings and vehicles by creating an invisible shield on surfaces. It gets to work immediately and, once the treatment is complete, the space is free of any pathogens. It is safe to access a treated area approximately 15 minutes afterwards.

Fogging is a safe, non-hazardous, water-based product that has a toxicity rating similar to Vitamin C. It is colourless and odourless and provides antibacterial, antiviral, anti-fungal and anti-algal protection without causing fumes.

Attached are two identical Joint Statements (one for Crowns and one for Supply Chain) which explain the benefits of Fogging and the process. The benefits include:

• It eradicates any airborne pathogens and surface bacteria
• It is odourless, non-leaching, non-corrosive and completely safe for humans and animals
• The treatment lasts for up to 30 days
• It is environmentally friendly

This additional safety measure will give our members added reassurance and confidence that all parties are working hard to ensure their workplace is as safe as it can be in these difficult times. Reassuringly this product has been tried and tested in the NHS and in Transport for London.

Yours sincerely

Andy Furey
Assistant Secretary

LTB 369/20 – Post Office – Covid 19 – Enhanced Cleaning – Zoono Fogging

Attachment 1 to 20LTB369 – Joint Statement DMBs

Attachment 2 to 20LTB369 – Joint Statement – Supply Chain

Latest Face Mask/Coverings Rules in the UK – [Face Mask/Covering Mandatory Rule Changes on 10 July – Shops in Scotland]

Latest Face Mask/Coverings Rules in the UK – [Face Mask/Covering Mandatory Rule Changes on 10 July – Shops in Scotland]

Government rules and guidelines are rapidly changing as the Coronavirus/Covid-19 pandemic evolves. As lockdown rules continue to be eased slightly in the UK, new safety measures are being introduced. One of these measures is wearing a face mask or covering which has become mandatory in some situations.

This LTB is to update Branches on the latest rules to be introduced on face masks and coverings in each of the four nations of the UK.

Scotland:

From Friday 10th July it will be mandatory to wear face coverings when entering shops throughout Scotland. This includes when going into Post Offices.  Royal Mail managers in Scotland have received a communication from the RMG Head of Health advising them to ensure their workforce are briefed and aware of the new ‘mandatory guidance’ and how to obtain a facemask/covering. This will include drivers, collections and delivery staff visiting these businesses. CSP’s (Customer Service Points) are classified as shops for the purposes of this guidance and therefore all customers using these facilities in Scotland will need to wear a face covering.  Posters will be made available to display this requirement. Employees who work in Customer Service Points will be provided with facemasks/coverings from their manager. The penalty for not wearing a face covering in shops in Scotland is a £60 on the spot Fixed Penalty Notice.

Royal Mail Group state that they have a good stock of masks, gloves and wipes (Protective Equipment) and there should be no problem with compliance by Royal Mail Group (Royal Mail, Parcelforce and RMSS staff) in Scotland.

Public Transport:

Face coverings are mandatory across the UK (England, Scotland and Northern Ireland) when using public transport (bus, trams, train, ferry or plane) except in Wales where it is recommended.

England

In England it is now compulsory to wear a face covering on public transport and in hospitals – staff, outpatients and visitors must wear them. This has been in place since 15 June. You don’t need to wear a face covering whilst waiting for public transport but train stations are asking people to wear them as they enter the station. You may be refused travel if you do not wear a face covering on board public transport. As a last resort, you may be fined up to £100 for not wearing a covering.

Some people are exempt from the new rules on face coverings including:

  • Children under 11 years old.
  • People unable to put on, wear or take off a mask due to a disability.
  • People with breathing difficulties.
  • Those travelling with someone who relies on lip reading.

In circumstances where it is really necessary to eat or drink on public transport, you will be able to lower your mask to do so.

The rules may not apply to some types of public transport including cruise ships, school transport, taxis and private hire vehicles. We all have a responsibility to check the latest rules and guidance with whichever company you are travelling with as some, such as Uber, are enforcing their own rules on face coverings.

The government expects that the number of people travelling on public transport will continue to increase in the coming weeks and months as more workplaces and shops start to reopen. However, they still encourage people to avoid the use of public transport as much as possible and only use it for essential journeys, to make it easier to socially distance and stay safe on board. Those who can continue to work from home should do so in line with the government’s advice.

Wales

The guidance in Wales is in line with the latest advice from the World Health Organisation. People in Wales are strongly encouraged to wear a face mask/covering on public transport and in other settings where social distancing is difficult such as crowded shops. As with all face mask advice, the Welsh Government clearly states that wearing a face mask should not be seen as a replacement or alternative to social distancing and hand washing.

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland has similar rules which have not changed since the beginning of May. Wearing face coverings has not yet been made mandatory but it is recommended for short periods in places where social distancing is impossible, including public transport and retail environments.

World Health Organisation (WHO) advice

The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that the use of a mask can be helpful to limit the spread of potentially infectious droplets in some public settings where physical distancing is not possible. As such, it recommends the use of non-medical fabric masks for people in the general public where at least a one metre distance cannot be maintained, such as on public transport, in shops, or other confined or crowded environments. The WHO advises you should clean your hands with an alcohol-based hand rub, or soap and water, before putting a face covering on, and it should cover your nose and mouth, with no gaps between the mask and your face. You should avoid touching the mask while you are using it – and if you do, thoroughly wash your hands after. Replace the mask with a new one as soon as it is damp, and do not reuse single use masks.

Face Masks General

The clear advice from the WHO is that social distancing and hygiene measures are by far the most effective ways to protect yourself and others from COVID-19. The evidence remains clear that the most effective way to protect yourself and others from infection is to follow social distancing rules, avoid touching surfaces and your face, and wash your hands regularly. Use sanitiser gel or disinfectant wipes where washing facilities are not available. Face coverings/masks are not a substitute for these measures, but in some circumstances where it might be difficult to stay 2m away from others, they may serve a useful protective purpose.

Yours sincerely,

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

LTB 368/20 – Latest Face Mask Coverings Rules in the UK – [Face Mask Covering Mandatory Rule Changes on 10 July – Shops in Scotland]

CWU Family

CWU Family

The National Executive Committee has agreed to introduce CWU Family, which extends some of the benefits available to CWU members to other members of their household at no additional cost.
CWU Family will make available a range of benefits to spouse, civil partner, co-habiting partner and dependent children of CWU members. Enrolment will be by notification by the paid-up member.
Benefits will include:

  • Regular updates from the union on news and industrial developments
  • Access to an online portal giving updated advice on industrial, employment and benefit matters (including government support relating to the Covid-19 pandemic)
  • Full access to the benefits package as available to the existing members as part of our agreement with Parliament Hill Ltd
  • Access to Unionline for advice on employment and non-employment matters
  • Assistance and representation for personal injuries claims, where appropriate
  • Will writing service – free of charge for simple wills, significantly reduced for more complex wills
  • Power of attorney at a reduced fee
  • Conveyancing service at a reduced fee

Activity is now underway with the aim of launching CWU Family in the autumn. Branches and members will be kept advised.Any enquiries regarding this LTB should be addressed to the Head of Recruitment & Organising by email torellis@cwu.org.

Yours sincerely,

RAY ELLIS
Head of Recruitment & Organising

LTB 367/20 CWU Family

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑