Election of NEC, Industrial Executives & National Officers 2019

FORMAL NOTICE

PLEASE NOTE THIS LTB CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION 
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION AND DISPLAY THROUGHOUT YOUR BRANCH

 

Dear Colleagues,

ELECTION OF: 

    • CWU National Executive Council
    • CWU Industrial Executives
    • CWU Assistant Secretary TFS 1
    • CWU Assistant Secretary TFS 2

 

Further to LTB 229/19 dated 12th April 2019, which contained formal notification of the timetable for the above elections.

The NEC has now approved the regulations for the above elections which are attached to this LTB for your information.  In addition to the regulations, due to the revised size and composition of the NEC, we have produced some informative guidelines to assist branches in the forthcoming election arrangements.  Again these are attached to this LTB.

Branches with members in the TFS constituency will also need to take into consideration the revised composition of the TFSE which can be found in Appendix 3 of the election regulations.

Please note that in respect of the CWU Assistant Secretaries; TFS 3, Legal Services and Health Safety and Environment, the NEC has taken the decision that it is necessary to continue to defer the elections for these positions pending the outcome of the Redesign Project review of CWU HQ structures and the review of the National Industrial structures as set out in proposition 27 which was carried at the 2019 General Conference.

For ease of reference the details of the National Representative positions to be elected in 2019 are set out below.

 

CWU NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COUNCIL & INDUSTRIAL EXECUTIVES 

1)     NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COUNCIL

NEC positions are subject to election in accordance with the CWU national rule that requires election for NEC and Industrial Executive positions every 2 years.

The NEC shall comprise of 30 members:

a) President and Vice President, but their inclusion shall not increase the numbers from their originating Constituencies.

b) 11 lay members elected biennially by and from the Postal Constituency and 1 of whom shall be the Vice Chair. All of whom shall automatically be members of the Postal Industrial Executive.

c) 2 lay members elected biennially by and from the Postal Constituency.

d) 8 lay members elected biennially from the Telecoms and Financial Services Constituency and 1 of whom shall be the Vice Chair. All of whom shall automatically be members of the Telecoms and Financial Services Industrial Executive.

e) 2 lay members elected biennially by and from the Telecoms and Financial Services Constituency.

f) 2 lay Young Workers members elected biennially who must be 29 or under at the time of the election. 1 of whom will be elected by and from the Postal Constituency and 1 of whom shall be elected by and from the Telecoms and Financial Services Constituency.

g) 1 lay Retired Member elected biennially by all members of the Retired sector.
The Retired Members NEC Representative shall not be entitled to vote on issues that are Financial, Rule, Constitutional or issues that could be considered to have an Industrial context except where they apply only to Retired Members.

h) 4 lay Equality members elected biennially 1 from each of the following equality strands: Women, LGBT, BAME, Disability.

From the date of introduction i.e. 2019 two strand members will be elected by and from members of the Postal Constituency and 2 strand members will be elected by and from members of the Telecoms and Financial Services Constituency.  The NEC will be responsible for the allocation of the 2 seats to each constituency. The selection will be reversed at the next series of elections i.e. after a 2 year period.

For the 2019 elections NEC allocation of the Equality Stand seats will be as follows:

Women – TFS Constituency
LGBT – Postal Constituency
BAME – TFS Constituency
Disability – Postal Constituency

Please note that the NEC members listed in categories c), e), f), g) and h) are members of the NEC only and are not automatically members of their respective Industrial Executives. 

 

2)     CWU INDUSTRIAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES

Postal Executive (PE)

The Postal Executive shall consist of 17 lay members elected biennially by and taken from the Postal Constituency of whom;

  • 2 shall be elected by and from PTS Grades.
  • 15 shall be elected by and from Postal Grades.

Separate ballots are conducted for the NEC and PE positions however in accordance with the rules of the union the elected Chair, Vice Chair and the 9 NEC members elected by the Postal Constituency will automatically be members of the PE.

In practice this means that the PE Ballot(s) will be for the remaining positions available which will be 6 positions. The precise number of “grade” positions available to 1) Postal Grades and 2) PTS Grades will vary depending on the grade of the successful candidates in the NEC election.

Further information regarding the voting entitlement for the PE elections will be published to branches prior to the dispatch of ballot papers.  

 

3)     TELECOMS & FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSTITUENCY INDUSTRIAL EXECUTIVE POSITIONS 

The Telecoms & Financial Services Executive (T&FSE) will consist of 16 lay members elected biennially.

The composition of the T&FS Executive is as follows:

a) 8 NEC members elected by and from all members in the Telecoms and Financial Services Constituency whom in accordance with the rules of the CWU shall automatically be members of the respective Industrial Executives.

b) 1 member elected by and from all members the Telecom & Financial Services Constituency and who must be aged 29 or under at the time of the election.

c) 1 member elected by and taken from members in the Santander Group and related companies (Santander UK, Santander UK Operations Ltd, Santander UK Technology Ltd, Santander Global and RR Donnelley).

d) 1 member elected by and taken from members in Telefonica O2 UK, Connect 44 and ISS Eaton.

e) 1 member elected by and from all members working for Capita in the T&FS Sector and 14Forty (Capita contract).

f) 4 members elected by and taken from all other members in the Telecom & Financial Services Constituency.

Further information regarding the voting entitlement for the T&FSE elections will be published to branches prior to the dispatch of ballot papers.

 

CWU ASSISTANT SECRETARY TELECOMS & FINANCIAL SERVICES – TFS 1 

The above TFS Assistant Secretary is currently responsible for dealing with the following companies:

BT Business & Public Sector, BT Ireland (non Networks), BT European Consultative Committee, BT Global Services, Computacenter, Ericsson, Anovo – Ingram Micro. 

 

CWU ASSISTANT SECRETARY TELECOMS & FINANCIAL SERVICES – TFS 2

The above TFS Assistant Secretary is currently responsible for dealing with the following companies:

Accenture, BT Personnel & Equality issues, BT Group HR, BT Learning, BT Technology, Service and Operations, Damovo, Hewlett Packard, Sopra Steria, Tech Mahindra.

The responsibilities of all CWU Assistant Secretaries shall be to carry out and discharge under the direction of the GS such Union duties as they may be deemed required to perform.

 

The timetable for all of the above elections, as previously notified in LTB 229/19, is as follows:

Nominations open:                                    21 May 2019
Nominations close:                                    11 June 2019 (14:00)
Accept nominations:                                  14 June 2019 (14:00)
(TFSE NEC/IE positions only):

Dispatch of ballot material from*:          2 July 2019
Ballot closes first post:                              24 July 2019 (First Post)
Result:                                                          26 July 2019

*Please note that ballot papers will be sent to all eligible members who are included in the membership register maintained by the union as at 2 June 2019.  Therefore any changes of address, etc. will need to have been received at CWU HQ prior to this date.

Branches will also wish to note that the independent scrutineer appointed by the union to oversee the election arrangements is Electoral Reform Services.

The Election Regulations stipulate that a copy of the regulations for these elections must be distributed to all branches in advance of the nomination process.  A copy of the Election Regulations is therefore attached and I would be grateful if you could ensure that these are brought to the attention of the members of your branch.

The regulations will also be published on the CWU website and a copy will be issued to all candidates nominated to stand in the Election(s). 

Further information regarding the nomination arrangements will be sent to branches in due course. However Branches are reminded that in order for nominations for the above positions to be valid then they will need to be submitted on the appropriate CWU HQ issued nomination forms.

 

Elections Prize Draws 

Branches are reminded that in order to protect the integrity of these very important national elections and more importantly, ensure that the union is legally compliant with the relevant legislation covering such elections, that election prize draws should not be conducted under any circumstances unless written authorisation has been given by the Senior Deputy General Secretary.

Any enquiries regarding this LTB should be addressed to Senior Deputy General Secretary Department, CWU HQ, for the attention of Peter Metcalfe on 0208 971 7368, or email: pmetcalfe@cwu.org

Yours sincerely,

 

Tony Kearns
Senior Deputy General Secretary

19LTB296

NEC & IE Election Regulations 2019

National Officer Election Regulations 2019

Election Guide 2019 – NEC & IE Elections



Motion E2 Carried at CWU Annual Conference

Motion E2 Carried at CWU Annual Conference

Branches will recall that motion E2 was carried at CWU Annual Conference. The motion seeks to resolve the ongoing issue of some members in BT Enterprise Field Service not receiving a pay rise in the last 3 years. The motion also instructed the Executive to ballot the relevant members for industrial action should this matter not be resolved through discussion by the 1st July this year.

This situation has developed as a result of some members having the former ITS Hendrix grading system imposed on them while they were employed in IT Services. Our ex-Computacenter members were specifically excluded from the Hendrix Grading system whilst employed in IT Services. Bizarrely, it was BT that put them into the Hendrix Grading system when they were TUPE’d back into BT plc in 2016. This was in spite of the fact that Hendrix grading did not pre-exist this TUPE anywhere else in BT plc. As things stand, they will face the prospect of not receiving a pay rise year on year, despite the gap between their pay and that of their Newgrid colleagues, who do identical work, continuing to increase. This is as a consequence of their current salaries being above the Hendrix pay max.

The T&FS Executive advised conference that the current field grading and operating model discussions includes these groups and this issue and will be directly impacted by whether or not a satisfactory solution can be found to resolve this unfairness, in respect of pay.

Discussions are continuing and the union is committed to doing all in its power to find a solution to this issue. Nevertheless we need to prepare for a potential situation where that may not be possible.

I am therefore writing to ask branches to ensure that their membership details with regards to BT Enterprise Field Service members are up to date and 100% accurate. The relevant OUC Is NKA.

Branches will be kept up to date as discussions continue and at some point in the next 3 weeks, there will be a branch forum to consider an update on the discussions and the situation concerning Motion E2. This forum may have to be called at short notice.

Any enquiries concerning this LTB should be directed to jquaife@cwu.org.

Yours sincerely,

 

Allan Eldred
Assistant Secretary

LTB 294.2019

Postal Industrial Conference 2019 – Motion 92

Postal Industrial Conference 2019 – Motion 92

Please find reproduced below the terms of the above mentioned Motion that was raised by the Glasgow & District Amalgamated Branch:

This Conference instructs the Postal Executive enter into immediate discussions with Royal Mail to seek an agreement that ensures, where an employee is underpaid through no fault of their own, that the facility available to rectify this (CHAPS payment) is made available regardless of the individual’s financial circumstances.

Please find attached for the information of colleagues, a letter that has been sent to Royal Mail and Parcelforce Senior Field Officials, the content of which is self-explanatory. It would be very much appreciated if Branches could ensure that a timely response is provided to requests for information/assistance from the Union’s Senior Field Officials who are coordinating this activity in the field. It is envisaged that this exercise will be concluded four weeks from the date of this LTB and further updates will be provided in due course. Branches/colleagues should also note that the attached Royal Mail Group policy should be circulated as widely as possible to area and local representatives as this will also assist Senior Field Officials with their activity.

Any enquiries in relation to the content of this LTB should be addressed to the DGS(P) Department.

Yours sincerely,

 

Ray Ellis
Acting Deputy General Secretary (Postal)

Attachment 1 to LTB 293-19 – 13.05.19 Postal Industrial Conference 2019 – Motion 92

Attachment 2 to LTB 293-19 – Reward Guide



POST OFFICE: HORIZON TRIAL – BATES & OTHERS VS POST OFFICE LTD

POST OFFICE: HORIZON TRIAL – BATES & OTHERS VS POST OFFICE LTD

Further to LTB 234/19 dated 12th April. I would like to provide Branches with an update regarding the Group Litigation Action against the Post Office by 557 former Postmasters who have been sacked, financially ruined and in some cases imprisoned for what they believe are errors with the Horizon computer system. 

Branches will recall that there are four trials in total in this case, and following the first of these – the “Common Issues” trial, the Judge, the Honourable Mr Justice Fraser ruled in favour of the claimants. The Judge was also critical of the relationship between the Post Office and the NFSP, stating that he found “that the NFSP is not fully independent”. 

Following the Judge’s ruling, the Post Office made an application for the sitting Judge Mr Fraser to be recused (remove himself from the trial) on the basis of “apparent bias”. This led to the temporary suspension of the second trial – the “Horizon issues” trial which began on 11th March. 

On 9th April, Mr Justice Fraser, made the decision NOT to recuse himself from the second trial and indeed the third and fourth trials. The Post Office’s QC asked the Judge for permission to appeal which was not granted. Therefore the Post Office went directly to the Court of Appeal to ask for permission to appeal against the recusal decision. 

On 10th May, without a hearing, the Court of Appeal made the decision to refuse the Post Office’s appeal. Lord Justice Coulson, in making this decision via a very detailed document which was highly critical of the Post Office, noted that the application was “without substance”. Lord Coulson also stated the following: 

“For the PO now to complain about the making of findings on these issues, which arose out of the way which they themselves put their case, is absurd.”

“The judge learned of the recusal application by accident just before the afternoon session of the last day of the factual evidence on the Horizon Issues trial This was at best discourteous; at worst, it betrayed a singular lack of openness on the part of the PO and their advisors.”

Lord Coulson also seemingly displayed some sympathy with the Postmasters who surmised that the Post Office’s recusal application was made for the purpose of delaying or causing the collapse of the Horizon trial when he stated: 

“It is a great pity that the recusal application and this application for permission to appeal have had the effect of delaying the conclusion of the critical Horizon sub-trial. Indeed, the mere making of these applications could have led to the collapse of that sub-trial altogether. Although I can reach no concluded view on the matter, I can at least understand why the SPMs originally submitted on 21 March that that was its purpose.”

The second trial will now recommence with the Managing Judge, Mr Fraser, on 4th June with the third and fourth trials scheduled for later this year and early next. 

In a communication dated 13th May (attached to this LTB for your information), Al Cameron, Interim Chief Executive, also indicated the Post Office will appeal the Managing Judge’s interpretation of the Postmasters’ contracts (trial one) and in this regard a hearing is now due to take place on 23rd May. 

Clearly the Horizon litigation is not going in the direction the Post Office would like and should this continue the costs and compensation to the claimants could be substantial.

Further developments on this important matter will be reported as they occur.

Further Details on the Horizon Trials

I would like to remind Branches and members that full details of the Horizon trials can be accessed via the journalist Nick Wallis’ website (note parts of the website are free and some sections you have to subscribe to):

https://www.postofficetrial.com/2018/07/about-me.html

Yours sincerely

 

Andy Furey

Assistant Secretary

19LTB292 Post Office – Horizon Trial – Bates & Others vs Post Office Ltd – Update

Attachment 1 to 19LTB292



Royal Mail Group – PDA Cabinet Cleaning Procedure and Periodicity

Royal Mail Group – PDA Cabinet Cleaning Procedure and Periodicity

Following a growing number of complaints from ASRs and Branches regarding the above the matter was discussed with RMP&FS and the following details have been provided:-

The RM P&FS Facilities Maintenance (FM) team advise that PDA cabinets are on an annual inspection and clean routine. This would involve hoovering out dust and fluff from the fan/ cooling unit.

If a PDA cabinet has been missed off the OMP, this is logged as a service failure and flagged up to the RBM team to add to the maintenance and cleaning routines for site.

All other reactive maintenance is done via a helpdesk job.

Area Health and Safety Reps are advised to carry out their periodic Workplace Safety Inspections ensuring the cabinets are checked during the course of the visits or initiate spot checks at all offices and where necessary log in calls to the RMP&FS Help Desk requesting cleans.

Yours sincerely

 

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

19LTB291 Royal Mail Group – PDA Cabinet Cleaning Procedure and Periodicity

Doc1



Independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) Report Published Calling on UK Government To End its Contribution to Global Warming with New Target of Net Zero Emissions by 2050:

Independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) Report Published Calling on UK Government To End its Contribution to Global Warming with New Target of Net Zero Emissions by 2050:

This is a report from the Trade Union led “Greener Jobs Alliance”, supported by the CWU, following important recent environmental developments.

Firstly, the UK Parliament passed a motion declaring a Climate Emergency and the ‘Committee on Climate Change’ has endorsed calls for a just transition as part of accelerating the move to a zero carbon economy.

The following report from the GLA gives the background on this and calls for commitments to engage with the trade union movement if the massive economic changes being proposed are going to get buy-in from workers.

On 2 May the independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has told the government that the UK must end its contribution to global warming with a new target of net zero emissions by 2050, and for the first time ever in an official report, the government has been told to deliver a Just Transition for workers and their communities.

The 2050 target date for zero emissions will disappoint many demonstrating across the UK. But the Committee’s call for a Just Transition across many sectors of the economy looks very much like a new industrial strategy for a Zero Carbon Britain. The Greener Jobs Alliance has now called for the government to reinforce this message by setting up a Just Transition Advisory Group, with union representation from the industrial, energy, public and voluntary sectors.

On Mayday evening, before the CCC’s report was published, thousands gathered in Parliament Square as MPs debated Labour’s Climate Emergencydeclaration. Speaking from the top of the FBU’s own fire engine, Matt Wrack, General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, said firefighters the world over were on the frontline, fighting the fire and flood impacts of climate change.

Both Caroline Lucas MP and Aaron Kiely from FoE (a member of the GJA steering group) called for a Just Transition for workers in a Zero Carbon Britain.

The new report doesn’t set the 2025 date for Zero Carbon Britain that Extinction Rebellion demands, https://rebellion.earth/act-now/events/news/ but one government adviser said, ‘Make no mistake, this report will change your life.’ Transformations will spread across all sections of society, from the way we work and what we produce, to how we power our homes, travel to work, what we eat and how we farm.

A ‘net-zero’ target meets the UK’s commitment under the Paris Agreement – the pact which the UK and the rest of the world signed in 2015 to curb dramatically the polluting gases that cause climate change. It’s just that many now argue the target date is too far off.

For the first time in an official report, the government is told to deliver a Just Transition for workers and their communities, quote: the Government should ensure that the overall transition is perceived as fair, and that vulnerable workers and consumers are protected. That means Treasury support. It must include analysis at the regional level and for specific industrial sectors. Scotland has already appointed an independent Just Transition Commission. The UK government should do the same.  

A whole section of the report at last acknowledges what the GJA and others have been saying for years: ‘There is potential for more jobs in some areas, and a decline in jobs in others. Employment needs may change in terms of location and skills.’ Maybe a fifth of all jobs in regions like Yorkshire and the Humber are affected, with their reliance on heavy industry and fossil fuels.

In the pages of this report, are the outlines of a new industrial strategy for a Zero Carbon Britain:

  • Up to one in five jobs across the UK will be affected by a Zero Carbon Britain strategy.
  • Major moves away from fossil fuels – with job losses across oil and gas extraction, power and heating industries, as well as job losses in supply chains for these sectors.
  • Some gas fired power stations could be needed, but they will need to run using hydrogen or Carbon Capture & Storage. All coal-fired stations close.
  • Huge job growth is expected in sectors like renewables, electric vehicles, home insulation and domestic heating.
  • Employment in offshore wind, for example, is predicted to quadruple to 27,000 jobs by 2030. The big prize comes when all three main parts of a wind turbine – the tower, the cell at the top and the blades – are made in the UK. The UK is currently a big importer of renewable technology. The UK has to develop full supply chains across the renewable energy sector.
  • By 2025 at the latest all new cars and vans should be electric, or use a low- carbon alternative such as hydrogen. The automotive industry must transition to electric vehicles, with major implications for jobs, skills and investment.
  • No new homes should be connected to the gas grid after 2025.
  • Retrofitting homes with energy efficiency measures and installing low-carbon heat into new and existing homes will require new skills. This programme could generate many more high-skilled jobs in the installation and construction industries.

The Committee warns that a just transition is essential:

If the impact of the move to net-zero emissions on employment and cost of living is not addressed and managed, and if those most affected are not engaged in the debate, there is a significant risk that there will be resistance to change, which could lead the transition to stall.

The GJA concludes that if the committee intends to heed this warning, it should set up a Just Transition Advisory Group, with union representation from across the labour movements’ industrial, energy, public services and voluntary sectors. The Committee already has three expert advisory groups on technology, international affairs and cost-benefits.

The CCC has acknowledged a TUC input to the study. However, the absence of a strategic advisory role for unions in the work of the Committee is no longer tenable.

The Committee on Climate Change report is available at this Link:

https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Net-Zero-The-UKs-contribution-to-stopping-global-warming.pdf.

Yours sincerely

 

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

19LTB289 Independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) Report Published Calling on UK Government To End its Contribution to Global Warming



Royal Mail Group Holiday Pay

Royal Mail Group Holiday Pay

Further to LTB 223/19 and associated flow chart regarding the above (flow chart attached for ease of reference).

As previously advised by David Wilshire in response to Motion 65 at Postal Group Conference, please note that in Paragraphs 7 and 11, the name of the relevant Legal & Medical Secretary or Branch Secretary should now be used to complete the attached documentation.

From the date of this LTB, any ACAS registration forms that are sent to the DGS(P) Department will now be forwarded to the appropriate Branch to be completed in line with the flow chart.

Any enquiries in relation to the content of this LTB should be addressed to the DGS(P) Department.

Yours sincerely,

 

Ray Ellis
Acting Deputy General Secretary (Postal)

19LTB288 Royal Mail Group Holiday Pay

Holiday Pay Flow Chart



Together Against Trump 4th June 2019

Together Against Trump – 4th June 2019

You will be aware Donald Trump is arriving in the UK on June 3rd for a state visit. Branches will recall the huge protest which met his latest visit to the UK and the significant profile of the CWU on this day.

On Tuesday 4th June the Together Against Trump will once again hold a central London event. The plan at this point is to assemble at Portland Place at midday and march to Trafalgar Square. The starting point of the rally is subject to change but timings (12:00 – 17:00) are fixed.

On this basis, whilst fully understanding all of the logistical difficulties of a weekday protest, we are calling for as big a CWU turnout as possible on the day, in London.

Further information on both the logistics and CWU plans for the day will be shared shortly.

Any enquiries on the above LTB should be addressed togsoffice@cwu.org

Yours sincerely

 

Dave Ward

General Secretary

19LTB290 Together Against Trump – 4th June 2019

View Online

NPC Tackling Intergenerational Fairness

 

Introduction 

The House of Lords’ Select Committee report entitled Tackling Intergenerational Fairness, published on 25 April 2019 is just the latest in a long line to argue for the scrapping or means-testing of universal pensioner benefits, on the premise that older people are no longer living in poverty. The report also argues that concessions such as the bus pass or winter fuel allowance are “outdated” and unfair to young people, and that government should rightly do more to support younger generations in the housing and employment market. This briefing paper therefore summarises the report and offers an analysis of its main arguments.

 

Recommendations

The 114 page report covers areas such as housing, lifelong learning, extending the working life, the role of communities and intergenerational taxation and produces a number of recommendations directly affecting older people, including: 

: 

 Removing the triple lock for the State Pension and instead uprating it in line with average earnings.
 Phasing out free TV licences based on age. The government should then decide if it wants to subsidise TV licences based on a means-test of household income.
 From 2026-28, when the state pension age (SPA)becomes 67, free bus passes and Winter Fuel Payments should only be available five years after a person becomes eligible for their State Pension. The age of entitlement to benefits should be harmonised with the SPA, but there should be transitional protection for those currently in receipt of the benefits so that they continue to receive them.
 Alongside changing the age at which individuals become eligible for these benefits, the government should also consider treating them as part of taxable income.
 Better off workers over the SPA, who earn over £12,500 a year should pay National Insurance while they continue to work.

 

The report also includes some wider recommendations:

 

 Action needs to be taken to substantially increase the supply of social housing by allowing local authorities to borrow to fund building programmes. Increasing the amount of housing which is accessible and adaptable for older generations should also be part of this increase in supply.
 There should be an increase in funding for Further Education and vocational training to tackle unfairness between those to go onto Higher Education and those who do not.
 There should be an assumption of the employment status of ‘worker’ by default to protect young people from exploitation or insecurity in the gig economy, while allowing those who wish to stay as self-employed to do so.
 The Treasury should publish a breakdown of the effects of each budget by generation and government should create Intergenerational Impact Assessments for all draft legislation.

 

 Council Tax should be reformed to take into account actual property values more than the current out of date system, allow those who have high assets but low incomes to delay payment until the property is sold and ensure second homes have to pay the full rate.
 The government should consider how Stamp Duty could be reformed to improve the housing choices and availability for young families.
 Inheritance tax is not fit for purpose and further consideration needs to be given as to whether and how assets should be taxed on death or transfer in a way that ensures fairness between the generations

 

Analysis

Like many of these reports, there are specific issues or recommendations with which almost everyone would agree. In this respect, the acknowledgement of the insecure nature of the world of work for many younger people, the need for greater employment rights and protection and the lack of affordable or suitable housing are all worth noting. However, many of the arguments affecting pensioners repeat those originally set out in the Resolution Foundation report, entitled A New Generational Contract, which was published last May.

 

One of the key drivers of the report is the idea that the amount a generation contributes in taxation over a lifetime should be broadly in line with what it receives.This is linked to a criticism that recent social security spending has been focussed more on older people, than those of working age. In particular, this argument rests on the triple lock – and the way in which the basic state pension has a guaranteed 2.5% annual increase compared to wage rises that have recently been lower. However, the Select Committee fails to acknowledge that despite the triple lock being in existence for eight years, the UK state pension remains the least adequate in the developed world, and pensioner poverty has risen in the last year to 1.9 million.

 

What’s also interesting is the report’s acceptance that the main inequality in society is inside generations, rather than between them, but says that as this was not part of the remit of their inquiry they have not considered it. Such an approach therefore severely undermines the credibility of some of their findings.

 

In addition, there are specific issues that need to be countered:

 

 The BBC has yet to decide the future of the over 75s’ TV licence, but it is widely accepted that the broadcaster should not be responsible for funding or administering part of the government’s wider social orwelfare policy. Suggestions of means-testing the concession will be fraught with costly bureaucracy and legal problems, and like all means-tests, is likely to end up hurting those who need the most support.
 In a similar way, the bold suggestion that the Winter Fuel Allowance and the bus pass should be scrapped for future generations bears absolutely no relation to the scale of fuel poverty in the UK, the rising number of winter deaths, the increase in loneliness among older people, the benefit of keeping active, mobile and independent in older age, the economic and environmental benefits of bus travel and the massive contribution that older people continue make to society in general. For example, the latest evidence shows that informal, unpaid carers save the exchequer £57bn a year in care costs alone.

 

 There is a false assumption made about the benefit to young people, if older people have their benefits reduced or removed altogether. For example, 

scrapping Winter Fuel Payments for older people would raise £2.16bn of government spending – less the cost associated with changes in behaviour by older people using less heating and the ensuing cold-related healthcare costs. However, if this money were distributed to those aged 16-30, this would give each individual approximately £181. By any standard this amount of money is unlikely to have any noticeable impact on the long-term prospects of this younger generation. Moreover, rather than benefiting younger people now – it effectively removes their right to receive such benefits when they eventually retire.

 

Conclusion 

More than at any other period in our history, our society is being divided and categorised in terms of the generation into which you were born. Such a divisive and simplistic approach incorrectly assumes that all those born into the same generation have the same life experience and outcomes. Like all age groups, health, property wealth and income are not evenly or equally distributed. Of course, there are specific policy issues that would assist younger generations to secure better economic prospects, but they do not involve reducing the pensions or benefits of the older generation.

 

Since 2008, households across the UK have experienced unprecedented falls in their living standards. However, contrary to much of the public debate, it is actually those of working age, rather than pensioners, who are currently most likely to be wealthy, with a very large proportion of our national wealth held by a very few households, regardless of age. Solutions to young people’s problems will not therefore be found by reducing entitlements for pensioners. Instead, improving the new generation’s chances requires profound changes in how we structure our economy and distribute wealth.

 

A copy of the House of Lords’ Select Committee report can be found at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldintfair/329/32902.htm

 

National Pensioners Convention

Marchmont Community Centre

62 Marchmont Street

London

WC1N 1AB

www.npcuk.org

Annual Conference 19 Retired Members

ANNUAL  CONFERENCE  2019

SPECIAL  RULES  REVISION  CONFERENCE

 

 

Retired Members

Dear All,

Below is a report of what transpired at Annual Conference 2019 referring to Retired Members,reference the Special Rules Revision. The first part is what’s in place. The second part is what the NEC wanted to change.

Regards.

Dick Hewlett

Retired Members Chair/Delegate to Annual Conference.

Part 1

There shall be the following Conferences held each year: 2018.

a) Annual (General and Industrial).   b) Women’s.  c)Black Workers. d) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual andTransgender.   e) Disability.   f) Retired Members.    g) Young Workers.

10.1.6 Retired Members’ Conference  2018 

1. The NEC shall determine the date, venue, duration and delegations to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

2. Each Branch shall be represented in proportion to the number of retired members, subject to a minimum representation of one delegate. 

3. Each Branch shall be entitled to submit one Motion to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

4. Each Retired Members’ Regional Committee shall be entitled to submit one Motion to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

5. The General Conference SOC shall determine the procedures to operate at the Retired Members’ Conference. 

6. The Retired Members’ Advisory Committee shall be consulted and be involved in the organisation of the Retired Members’ Conference. 

7. The Retired Members’ Advisory Committee shall be responsible for pursuing the policies adopted at the Retired Members’ Conference via the NEC and its appropriate sub-committees. 

8. The Retired Members’ Conference shall elect two delegates to attend CWU General Conference who   will be entitled to speak on items that impact upon the union’s retired members. 

9. The Retired Members’ Conference may submit two motions to CWU General Conference. 

10. Retired Members’ Regional Committee Secretaries shall attend the Retired Members’ Conference in an ex-officio capacity with the right to speak and move motions on behalf of their Retired Members’ Regional Committee but not to vote.   Funding for Retired Members’ Regional Committee Secretaries to attend Retired Members’ Conference shall be from the General Fund. 

11. The Retired Members’ Advisory Committee shall be entitled to submit up to three motions to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

 

Part 2

39.  Delete Rule 10.1.4 and insert: LOST UNANIMOUSLY

    There shall be the following Conferences held each year: 

   A)  Annual (General and Industrial) 

   The following Conferences will be held biennially: 

   A)   Retired Members 

  B)   Young Workers 

 National Executive Council.

 

47.  Delete Rule 10.1.6 and insert:   WITHDRAWN

Retired Members’ Conference  

1. There shall be a Biennial Retired Members’ Conference. The NEC shall  determine the date, venue, duration and delegations to the Retired  Members’ Conference. 

2. Each Branch shall be represented in proportion to the number of Retired  Members, subject to a minimum representation of one delegate. 

3. Each Branch shall be entitled to submit one Motion to the Retired  Members’ Conference. 

4. Each Retired Members’ Regional Sub Committee shall be entitled to submit one Motion to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

5. The General Conference SOC shall determine the procedures to operate  at the Retired Members’ Conference. 

6. The Retired Members’ Committee shall be consulted and be involved in the organisation of the Retired Members’ Conference. 

7. The Retired Members’ Committee shall be responsible for pursuing the  policies adopted at the Retired Members’ Conference via the NEC. 

8. The Retired Members’ Conference shall elect two delegates to attend  CWU General Conference who will be entitled to speak on items that impact upon the union’s retired members. 

9. The Retired Members’ Conference may submit two motions to CWU General Conference. 

10. Retired Members’ Regional Committee Lead shall attend the Retired  Members’ Conference in an ex-officio capacity with the right to speak  and move motions on behalf of their Retired Members’ Regional  Committee but not to vote.   Funding for Retired Members’ Regional  Committee Lead to attend Retired Members’ Conference shall be from the General Fund.

11. The Retired Members’ Committee shall be entitled to submit up to three  motions to the Retired Members’ Conference. 

National Executive Council  

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑