Resourcing Principles Agreement Between Royal Mail and The CWU Covering the Deployment of Dimension, Weighing & Scanning (DWS) Equipment to All Mail Centres

Resourcing Principles Agreement Between Royal Mail and The CWU Covering the Deployment of Dimension, Weighing & Scanning (DWS) Equipment to All Mail Centres

Branches are informed that the Department were made aware that the business was trialling Dimension Weight Scanners in the Special Delivery Lockers within Manchester and London Central Mail Centres. This activity was not agreed with the CWU in advance and was progressed unilaterally by the business following their move to a new unagreed trial process.

However, representations were made to the business and following discussion the department has now been able to bring this activity back in line with previously agreed processes. To this end, given that the trial of the equipment has been viewed as a success, please find attached an agreement on Resourcing Principles for the deployment of the DWS activity, which was endorsed by the Postal Executive at a meeting on 7th November 2023.

The deployment of DWS equipment is an integral part of the Events Based Billing (EBB) Portfolio, which supports the Revenue Integrity strategy. The DWS machine will provide the business with the capability to measure and capture data to help identify miss-declared items in the SD operation. This data will aid BAU reconciliation processes in the recovery of revenue, which will ensure the business is paid correctly for the work it does. This strategy will be delivered through three capability pillars, which are highlighted below:

DWS activity will take place in two 4-hour windows, 16.30 to 20.30 (outward) and 01.00 to 05.00(inward). Each machine will be staffed by 1 employee, which with their introduction across all Mail Centers would potentially introduce new roles into the Mail Centre. Discussions have secured the full involvement of the CWU in agreeing workload for the DWS. This includes aligning other work to aid in creating full time duties, including reviewing innovative duty patterns. This could also assist with the supernumerary situation in some locations.

In line with previous agreements, the document confirms that all Health & Safety requirements, including SSOW, will be jointly developed by Royal Mail and the CWU National Health and Safety department.

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to Davie Robertson, Assistant Secretary, email: shayman@cwu.org, quoting reference: 714.12.

Yours sincerely,

Davie Robertson
Assistant Secretary

286-23 – DWS Resourcing Principles Agreement 09.11.23

Resourcing Principles SD DWS Final Nov 2023

View Online

LGBT+ Officer Toolkit

LGBT+ Officer Toolkit

The Equality, Education and Development department are pleased to announce the publication of the LGBT+ Toolkit.

The new toolkit has been designed to help LGBT+ activists understand their roles and responsibilities. It also contains useful information and guidance on meeting arrangements, training and includes useful tips on how to get started and make the most out of the role.

A copy of the LGBT+ Toolkit, including a dyslexia friendly digital version can be found attached to this LTB. The department encourages all branches to use the dyslexia friendly digital version when sharing electronic copies.

Any queries on this LTB should be directed to equality&education@cwu.org in the first instance.

Yours sincerely,

Kate Hudson
Head of Equality, Education & Development

23LTB 285 – LGBT+ Officer Toolkit  

Att 1 – 07040 – LGBT+ Toolkit v2

Att 2 – 07040 – LGBT+ Toolkit – dyslexia friendly – v2

View Online

LGBT+ Officer Toolkit

LGBT+ Officer Toolkit

The Equality, Education and Development department are pleased to announce the publication of the LGBT+ Toolkit.

The new toolkit has been designed to help LGBT+ activists understand their roles and responsibilities. It also contains useful information and guidance on meeting arrangements, training and includes useful tips on how to get started and make the most out of the role.

A copy of the LGBT+ Toolkit, including a dyslexia friendly digital version can be found attached to this LTB. The department encourages all branches to use the dyslexia friendly digital version when sharing electronic copies.

Any queries on this LTB should be directed to equality&education@cwu.org in the first instance.

Yours sincerely,

Kate Hudson
Head of Equality, Education & Development

23LTB 285 – LGBT+ Officer Toolkit  

Att 1 – 07040 – LGBT+ Toolkit v2

Att 2 – 07040 – LGBT+ Toolkit – dyslexia friendly – v2

View Online

Delivery Office Revisions/Floor Plan Changes and Sorting Frame Moves and Adjustments in Breach of ‘Mandatory’ SAC1, SWI, TBRA etc., and ‘Mandatory’ ASR Engagement and Consultation:

Delivery Office Revisions/Floor Plan Changes and Sorting Frame Moves and Adjustments in Breach of ‘Mandatory’ SAC1, SWI, TBRA etc., and ‘Mandatory’ ASR Engagement and Consultation:

The Health, Safety and Environment Department continues to receive a large and continual number of health and safety complaints and health and safety dispute/escalations from Branch Area Health and Safety Representatives involving Delivery Offices where Revisions, Floor Plan Changes and Sorting Frame Moves and Adjustments are being undertaken in breach of the ‘Mandatory’ Safety Concurrence (SAC1), Safe Working Instructions (SWI), Task Based Risk Assessment (TBRA) etc., plus the ‘Mandatory’ requirement to undertake ASR engagement and consultation as set out in RMG SHE Instructions, National Agreements and of course the law (SRSC Regulations 1977).

This matter has been raised with Elizabeth Lloyd Royal Mail Group Director Health and Safety, Sue Cuddihey Royal Mail Group Head of Safety for Programmes plus all newly appointed Field Operations Directors and Regional Operations Directors, requesting that all Unit Managers, PiCs, COMs, OPLs and Planners be reminded of the rules and correct approach to safety compliance when planning, initiating and undertaking changes with CWU ASR consultation being the first action.

In every one of these cases of complaint the consistent theme involves Unit Managers and Planners breaking the rules and blatantly breaching ‘Mandatory’ Safety and Operational Instructions, National Agreements and Health and Safety Regulations, all of which Managers and Planners should be more than familiar with. The first versions of the ‘Mandatory’ SAC1, SWI and TBRA were put in place two and a half years ago with later updated versions issued around a year ago.

Every Office Revision has a ‘pre-populated’ action plan embedded, which reinforces key CWU ASR engagement points to ensure consultation takes place in good time. Some actions are not necessarily applicable to all Office Revisions but should be discussed and discounted.

There is no reason or excuse that Managers can therefore legitimately offer for not being aware of these important safety instructions and we have requested an investigation and explanation as to why such blatant and obvious breaches of safety and other mandatory Royal Mail Instructions are occurring.

The law is crystal clear that when changes of this nature take place the ASR (Accredited and Credentialed) Area Safety Rep, must be consulted in good time as reiterated by the RMG SHE Standards and RMG Safety Policy signed by the CEO.

Reports from ASRs inform us that without warning or engagement and consultation, sorting frames are being moved and floor plans re-arranged in a hap-hazard, non-compliant way, causing damage to the sorting frames, affecting stability and damage to the unit floor surfaces as well as affecting things such as work station space standards, aisle widths, lighting, fire escape routes etc. The Health, Safety and Environment Department has requested that:

  • These situations are curtailed.
  • Managers ignoring the SAC1, SWI, TBRA and breaching Safety Instructions to be investigated as to the reason for this.
  • Any frames moved incorrectly to be inspected by RMP&FS to ensure they are safe and free from damage.
  • Delivery Offices to be jointly checked and inspected with the CWU/ASR to ensure floor plans and space standards are in compliance.
  • Workplace Risk Assessments to be reviewed jointly to ensure full compliance.

We have also requested that all PiCs, COMs, OPLs and Planners, be reminded of the need to work with the CWUs ASRs and the RMG SHE Team of SHE Advisors, ensuring compliance with the attached:

  • Mandatory Delivery Revisions (Inc.Frame Moves) SAC1 (Safety, Health & Environment Concurrence).
  • Mandatory SWI (Safe Working Instruction) for Frame Movements (Dismantling, Removal and Relocation of RM2000 Frames and Wings).
  • Mandatory Frame Movements TBRA (Task Based Risk Assessment).
  • Royal Mail Managers “Frame Moves” Sharepoint Extract. Covering Mandatory rules on “Frame Moves”, the SAC1, SWI and TBRA documents can be accessed shown alongside Delivery Office Space Standards, Overarching Delivery Revisions SAC, RM2000 Prep Guide and What Goes Where Guide.
  • RMG Safety Policy.
  • CWU ASR Job Description based on The Health And Safety At Work Act 74 and Safety Reps and Safety Committees Regulations 1977 and legal guidance.
  • CWU ASR’s Legal Rights To Carry Out Inspections.

It’s important to stop sorting frames being dragged around and damaged or not constructed correctly, leading to the risk of sorting frames being unstable and at worst collapsing.

Sorting frames that have been moved incorrectly need to be checked over by RMP&FS at the earliest opportunity to ensure they are safe and not damaged and that all components, strengthening struts and retaining screws are in place, tight, secure and not stretched or broken with any missing parts replaced.

Sorting frames moved locally have to follow the attached SAC1/SWI/TBRA and this is the message ASRs need to get out there and be enforced with the support of the RM SHE Team FODs and RODs.

The ‘MANDATORY’ SAC1/SWI/TBRA puts in place a number of strict controls and limitations on Floor Plan Changes And Sorting Frame Moves being done locally as follows:

  • Before any workplace changes and alterations the CWU ASR must be fully engaged and consulted with his/her input taken into account.
  • Before moving/relocating any Sorting Frames, the RM Central Programmes Team/ RM Delivery Design Team must be consulted for clearance regarding the changes and a ‘CAD drawing’ should be obtained from the Property Records Team via the Delivery Estates Team.  Any revised floor plan must ensure Space Standards are met, with a fire plan/evacuation plan updated, Workplace Risk Assessment, aisle widths/walkways, escape routes and lighting standards checked and standards met and equalities act protected staff with disabilities given appropriate consideration etc., – all to be done in full consultation with the ASR.
  • If the Sorting Frames are bolted to the floor they cannot be moved locally. (The moves must be referred to RMP&FS).
  • If the Sorting Frames have Electric Task Light Fittings they cannot be moved locally. (The moves must be referred to RMP&FS).
  • Those performing the Frames moves must be MH trained.
  • The base unit and wings must be completely unbolted and dismantled with the base and wings moved separately.
  • All bolts have to be changed when re-assembling the Sorting Frames base and wings (which can be a base and six wings).
  • If any bolts are broken off in the anchor bolt sockets then RMP&FS Engineers will have to be called in to drill them out and replace them with a nut and bolt.
  • All staff moving Sorting Frames must be provided with PPE protective (Toetector) footwear before they start (ordered and delivered from RM Uniform/Dimensions).
  • All staff moving Sorting Frames must undergo Manual Handling Training.
  • The movement of the assembled ‘Base’ Unit must be a ‘four-person lift’.
  • The movement of wings is a ‘two-person lift’.
  • The Frames must not be ‘dragged’ across the floor which can damage both the sub-frame structure of the frames and the floor
  • The Task Base Risk Assessment ‘bottom line’ states “Individuals should only complete this task if they feel able to do so”. (Our operational members can therefore opt out of moving Sorting Frames if they are asked to undertake Sorting Frame moves).

The Health, Safety and Environment Department does not support and has objected to Frames being moved locally. Our view is that it’s best done by RMP&FS Engineers. The RM COO however continues to support a ‘DIY approach’.

To reiterate my advice above, following any Frame moves, I recommend that the Frames be checked for safety by RMP&FS Engineers.

ASRs are requested to make proactive representations to OPLs and PiCs reminding them of the above and attached should they have any plans to make changes in Units.

ASRs should also carry out inspections (in line with the attached ASR Job Description and Safety Inspection Guide), looking carefully at the condition of Sorting Frames, recording and reporting any Frames found with faults or safety issues.

Yours sincerely

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

23LTB284 Delivery Office Revisions Floor Plan Changes and Sorting Frame Moves and Adjustments

CWU Safety Reps Rights to Carry out Inspections & Investigations

CWU Safety Reps Role and Function

Delivery Revision SAC1 Revision Template_v9

Dismantle Removal and Relocation of RM2000 Frames and Wings SWI v1.1

RMG-health-and-safety-policy-2022

Royal Mail Managers “Frame Moves” Sharepoint Extract

Frame Moves Task Risk Assessment v1.1

View Online

Tackling Hate Crime and Hate Incidents: A Workplace Issue

Tackling Hate Crime and Hate Incidents: A Workplace Issue

The Equality, Education and Development department are pleased to share with branches our new
publication “Tackling Hate Crime and Hate incidents: A workplace issue”.

This publication has been produced by our LGBT+ Regional Leads and provides useful information
and guidance on what hate crime is, the importance of reporting incidences of hate crime and why
it is a workplace issue.

A copy of the Hate Crime publication, including a dyslexia friendly digital version can be found
attached to this LTB. The department encourages all branches to use the dyslexia friendly digital
version when sharing electronic copies.

Any queries on this LTB should be directed to equality&education@cwu.org in the first instance.

Yours sincerely,

Kate Hudson
Head of Equality, Education & Development

23LTB 283 – Tackling Hate Crime and Hate Incidents – A Workplace Issue

Att 1 – 07041 CWU tackling hate crime

Att 2 – 07041 CWU tackling hate crime – dyslexia friendly

View Online

Tributes to Jane Loftus CWU President

Tributes to Jane Loftus CWU President

Following the extremely sad news last week of the passing of CWU President Jane Loftus, we have been working on an initial tribute to recognise the contribution Jane made to our union and the wider movement.

Therefore, on Tuesday 7th November at 10am we will hold a Branch meeting on Zoom to give the whole union the opportunity to participate in a minute’s silence.

You can register for the meeting via this link https://cwu-org.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZIsc-ihrz0pGdapGNNEJaNQy9WWU-wZPn5z

We have also opened an online condolence book where you can leave your memories of Jane and messages for her family. We will use all of the contributions to produce a book for her loved ones.

The link to the condolences page is here https://www.cwu.org/a-tribute-to-jane-loftus/

The NEC will also be considering other ways of marking Jane’s contribution, including at our annual conference.

Yours sincerely,

Dave Ward                           

General Secretary                                          

Tony Kearns

Senior Deputy General Secretary

LTB 280/23 – TRIBUTES TO JANE LOFTUS CWU PRESIDENT

View Online

JOINT STATEMENT BETWEEN PARCELFORCE WORLDWIDE AND THE CWU ON THE EXTENSION OF THE TRIAL HYBRID REWARD MECHANISM/C&D DRIVER PRODUCTIVITY INCENTIVE SCHEME FOR PEAK

JOINT STATEMENT BETWEEN PARCELFORCE WORLDWIDE AND THE CWU ON THE EXTENSION OF THE TRIAL HYBRID REWARD MECHANISM/C&D DRIVER PRODUCTIVITY INCENTIVE SCHEME FOR PEAK

In June this year, the Postal Executive cleared a document covering the trial of a Hybrid reward scheme for Parcelforce C&D drivers. This scheme was the initial step in delivering the BRT&G commitments in Appendix 3, Section 2 in relation to the development of an alternative reward mechanism for performance beyond core, one of the key commitments which had moved the business from the drive to an Owner Driver model.

Due to positive feedback in the 17 trial offices, the business approached us to extend the trial through the Peak period for all Parcelforce C&D Drivers. The extended Hybrid Reward Mechanism will therefore cover all 54 depots (all C&D non-bulk routes) across the UK, commencing from Monday, 6th November 2023 until Friday, 12th January 2024.

The calculated gateway total of delivered stop figures will be shared with the CWU Unit Rep and Regional Organiser before the scheme is launched. Additional workload can be carried out either within or beyond normal attendance patterns.

The gateway is based on core attendance. Additional deliveries beyond that will attract the incentive payment instead of Scheduled Attendance. Earnings will be underpinned at the appropriate SA level for the duration of the scheme. Current service levels need to be maintained during this trial extension.

We believe there is potential for significant additional earnings for our members and this is the logical next step in testing the assumptions of the alternate reward scheme. Discussions have therefore now concluded with a Joint Statement being agreed, a copy of which is attached.

For the avoidance of doubt, this is not an alternative to the Peak Incentive Scheme launched in Royal Mail, which of course was not done through agreement with the CWU. While the Royal Mail Scheme was not agreed, there is a clear anomaly that Royal Mail Group has chosen not to extend this approach to Parcelforce employees despite the fact that Quality of Service is of equal importance in Parcelforce, especially during Peak.

Given this, the department has approached the business seeking agreement with regard to the traditional Peak Weekend Coverage scheme and indeed a wider approach to incentives in the other functions within Parcelforce, especially against the backdrop of Royal Mail’s Peak Incentive Scheme.

Further updates will be given on this issue as discussions develop.

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to Davie Robertson, Assistant Secretary, email: shayman@cwu.org quoting reference: 054.13.

Yours sincerely,

Davie Robertson
Assistant Secretary

278-23 – Parcelforce Reward Scheme – 03.11.2023

Attachment – JS Extension of Hybrid Reward Mechanism Peak 2023

View Online

JANE LOFTUS – CWU PRESIDENT

JANE LOFTUS – CWU PRESIDENT

We are deeply saddened to announce that CWU President and Chair of the Postal Executive Jane Loftus has passed away earlier today following a short illness.

This news will be extremely upsetting to us all.

Jane was a huge figure in our union over many decades and we know Branches, Representatives and members will be shocked and saddened by this news.

We will of course find an appropriate way to mark Jane’s legacy in this union in due course.

However, Jane will be remembered for her passion and commitment and for her inspirational campaigning against all forms of injustice and discrimination – both within the CWU and the wider movement.

At this moment in time our thoughts are with Jane’s husband Chris, her daughter Joanne and her family and on behalf of the whole union we offer them our heartfelt condolences.

Yours sincerely

Dave Ward                                                                
General Secretary  

Tony Kearns
Senior Deputy General Secretary

LTB 279/23 – JANE LOFTUS CWU PRESIDENT

View Online

BIG TRUST SURVEY 2023 – RESULTS

BIG TRUST SURVEY 2023 – RESULTS

Further to LTB 235/23 circulated on 13thSeptember 2023, Branches and Representatives will be aware that we adopted a neutral position in relation to Royal Mail’s 2023 ‘Big Trust Survey’.  The survey was conducted from 4th to 24thSeptember and we have now been provided with a copy of the headline results (attached).

Predictably, the participation rate was well down at 53%, representing a decline of 16% on the 2022 returns, when the survey activity was conducted and promoted jointly.  Whilst both the Wellbeing Index and the Diversity, Equality and Inclusion scores were the same as in 2022, the Trust Index and Engagement Index scores declined dramatically.  All four-headline measures were also substantially lower than the UK external benchmark figure.

These results are hardly surprising given the ongoing attitude of Royal Mail and the way our members are being treated in the workplace and their ‘we know best’ approach toward Industrial Relations.  Morale is evidently at an all-time low and the continuous failures of Quality of Service and the USO only add to the crisis in confidence.  The decision to bypass the CWU when compiling the questions and promoting the survey, is clearly another factor in the scores nose-diving.

I have written to Royal Mail to request a breakdown of the results by question, as well as by ROD and OPL area in order to conduct a full analysis of the feedback.  Additionally, the PFW ‘Big Trust Survey’ results have only just been received and therefore a separate communication regarding this feedback will be circulated in due course.

Previously, action plans were agreed at a unit level following the joint surveys conducted during 2021 and the early part of 2022.  The aim of these action plans was to improve and address some of the key issues highlighted in the survey.  It is however unclear whether management intend to respond to the 2023 survey or whether the feedback will simply be ignored.  Therefore, everyone should remain vigilant and ensure local management do not proceed with their own unagreed action plans arising from the survey, as without local engagement with the Union these will be rendered meaningless.

Yours sincerely

Andy Furey
A/Deputy General Secretary (Postal)

23LTB277 BIG TRUST SURVEY 2023 – RESULTS

Unagreed Big Trust Survey

View Online

THE BRANCH OFFICERS/REPS GUIDE TO PROCESSING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS

THE BRANCH OFFICERS/REPS GUIDE TO PROCESSING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS

This briefing is to guide Branches when assisting members who are considering taking unfair dismissal/discrimination complaints to an Employment Tribunal. It replaces our previous guidance in LTB 222/2018.

Members’ Entitlements

Members are entitled to the benefits and services of the Legal Services Department as governed by National Rule 4.1.7. “Members of the Union are entitled to receive appropriate benefits and as negotiated by the Union either nationally or locally and appropriate legal services at the discretion of the NEC in accordance with published procedures”. Members should be made aware that the Union is not obliged to support any case unless we consider that it has reasonable prospects of success, i.e. 50% or more. This criterion was agreed by the Union at National Conference.

Members have the right to take a complaint of unfair dismissal or unlawful discrimination and other disputes to a Tribunal provided they meet the qualifying legal conditions. It is mandatory for members who are considering making a claim to notify ACAS first by completing and submitting an Early Conciliation form. Members should always be made aware that an Employment Tribunal hearing is not a re-run of an employer’s internal discipline procedure and no matter how much an individual may feel an injustice has occurred, any application to the Employment Tribunal must be based on facts and not simply a desire to have a day in Court. The CWU has an obligation to assist its members. However, representation will only be authorised if a case has the required merit.

Branch Officials’ Responsibilities

As Branch Officials, you are responsible for processing requests for assistance from members of your Branch. Also, the Employment Tribunal can be accessed independently by members and their advisers. Our advice is that all Branches should have at least one Officer dedicated to these issues and a procedure to facilitate efficient and timely processing of all these ET claims to the Legal Services Department. We will be happy to discuss the practicalities of this advice with Branches, recognising the various internal structures and geographical spread.

Once an approach is made for assistance, Branches should note it is not their responsibility to provide representation to any member until the Employment Tribunal application has been assessed by the Legal Services Department. Branches should assist members with the application process and, once this is complete, all documentation should be forwarded to the Legal Services Department for assessment. This instruction is important, as we have had situations where Branches have become involved in representing members within the Tribunal process and have then got into difficulty, which has resulted in our members’ claims failing and claims being made against the CWU for negligence.

Branches should note it remains the responsibility of the member to submit his or her claim/s to ACAS for Early Conciliation and any subsequent application to the Employment Tribunal via form ET1. At no point should Branches go on record as the member’s representative to either of the above bodies.

Contained within the Appendix attached to this LTB is a Branch Consultation Record document which must be used by the Branch whenever assistance is provided to members. It must be completed, signed and sent to the Legal Services Department along with any request for assistance.

Time Limits

It is vitally important that members are made aware of the time limits for submitting a claim to the Employment TribunalsFor unfair dismissal claims, the 3 month time limit begins from the effective date of termination of employment. Members should not wait for any internal appeals procedure to be completed and should proceed with ACAS Early Conciliation within 3 months less 1 day of the effective date of termination of employment.

In discrimination cases, the time limit begins from the date of the “act” complained of. Again, the ACAS Early Conciliation process must begin within 3 months less 1 day of the date of the “act” complained of.

It is the responsibility of members to lodge Early Conciliation within the relevant time scales.

Starting the ACAS Early Conciliation (EC) process

Members will not be able to make an application to an Employment Tribunal without first making a claim via ACAS for Early Conciliation. This is a mandatory requirement. Once the Early Conciliation process is completed, ACAS will issue the member with an ACAS Certificate, which contains a unique reference number and must be quoted in the ET1 form, otherwise the Tribunal will reject the application.

Members should register with ACAS, as soon as they become aware of a dispute that may lead to an Employment Tribunal claim.

The time limits for submitting a claim to the Tribunal office still apply, but will be frozen once the application for EC has been received by ACAS. This is a protected period during which time the clock is stopped with regard to the 3 month period for submitting an ET1 claim form.

The ET time limit clock restarts once the conciliation process ceases and the appropriate ACAS certificate has been issued and received by the Claimant.

In cases where a Claimant is required to participate in EC, the ordinary limitation period for their claim(s) is extended to give the parties an opportunity to engage in the process. To achieve this, the limitation clock stops for a specific period, calculated as follows

Day A = Date the claimant submits the EC form
or provides this information to ACAS by telephone)              Clock stops the following day

Day B = Date the claimant receives EC Certificate
(or is deemed to receive it)                                                           Clock resumes the following day

Example 1 

Claimant X is dismissed on 10 March 2023
Ordinary limitation date: 9 June 2023
4 April Claimant completes EC Form online – Day A is 4 April. The clock stops from 5 April 20 April EC Certificate sent by email – Day B is 20 April
The clock stops from 5 April to 20 April amounting to 16 days (as all days are counted)
That period is added to the ordinary limitation date of 9 June.
Limitation expires on 25 June 2023.

Example 2

Claimant X is dismissed on 10 March 2023
Ordinary limitation date: 9 June 2023
4 April Claimant completes EC Form online – Day A is 4 April.
5 April EC Certificate sent by email – Day B is 5 April
The clock stops on 5 April amounting to 1 day. That period is added to the ordinary limitation date of 9 June. Limitation expires on 10 June 2023.

Example 3

Claimant X is dismissed on 10 March 2023
Ordinary limitation date: 9 June 2023
7 June Claimant completes EC Form online – Day A is 7 June.
1 July EC Certificate sent by email – Day B is 1 July
The clock stops from 8 June to 2 July (24 days). However, because ordinary limitation would have expired between Day A and within one month after Day B, limitation is extended by one month after Day B. Limitation therefore expires on 1 August 2023.

Individuals can complete the Early Conciliation notification form electronically by contacting Acas via their website (this is their preferred option) – http://www.acas.org.uk/earlyconciliation

By telephone via their national helpline number 0300 123 1100

By posting the form to EC Notifications, ACAS (Phoenix) PO Box 10279, Nottingham, NG2 9PE

Steps our members must take

  • Contact ACAS as soon as possible irrespective of whether the member feels a settlement can be reached.
  • Provide ACAS with their contact details along with the contact details of the employer and representative 
  • Details of the claim not needed at this stage
  • If the member requires CWU assistance, provide ACAS with the contact details of the Legal Services Department
  • If a settlement cannot be reached, then ACAS will issue an EC certificate
  • Members can now submit an Employment Tribunal claim form (ET1) whilst still pursuing a dispute.

Please refer to LTBs 143/2014 and 044/2015 for further information on ACAS EC. 

Some claims are exempt from the requirement to submit an Early Conciliation Form. However, if in doubt, ACAS should be contacted for advice, as quickly as possible.

Authorisation of Legal Representation

In order for representation to be considered, the Legal Services Department will require our member’s ACAS Early Conciliation certificate, a copy of the ET1 claim form, the employer’s response (ET3) and all relevant internal discipline/grievance and appeal notes and decisions in order that an initial assessment can be made as to the merits of the claim. All applications will be assessed by the Employment team at Unionline who will provide written legal advice as to the merits of our member’s claim. If the advice is positive then arrangements will be made via the Legal Services Department for representation to be provided either by one of the CWU’s in-house ET Panellists or by Unionline’s employment lawyers.

In the event the legal advice is negative, the Legal Services Department will either reject the claim outright or authorise one of the CWU’s in-house ET Panellists to review the claim and where appropriate make arrangements to interview the member along with the branch officials, in order to assess the claim from an industrial viewpoint. We have adopted this approach, as there are occasions where we feel our members have been treated unfairly by the employer and there may be circumstances whereby a non-legal view is able to shed new light on our member’s claim, which, linked with the legal advice, provides us with a stronger case. If appropriate, the ET Panellist can recommend support. The final decision on providing representation will rest with the Legal Services Department.

On all occasions, Branches should resist from advising members as to the likely outcome of such assessments, as this may lead to unrealistic expectations.

Making an Application

It remains the individual’s responsibility to submit the ET1 claim form to the Tribunal office and Branches may assist members with this process. Branches must not submit the form on the member’s behalf.

Members should submit their ET1 claim form direct to the Employment Tribunal Office. Once they have received an acknowledgement that the claim has been lodged, they should send a copy of the claim form to the Legal Services Department.

Branches should note and explain to members that once the ET application has been lodged with the appropriate Tribunal office, the normal process for assessment will be made by the Legal Services Department as to the merits of the claim. A decision on representation will be made once the application has been assessed.

Online applications can be made via the website at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/make-a-claim-to-an-employment-tribunal-form-et1

If a member is making a claim by post in England and Wales, the ET1 form can be sent to the Employment Tribunals Central Office, Post Office Box 10218, Leicester, LE1 8EG. 

If the member is making a claim in Scotland, the form should be sent to: Employment Tribunals Central Office, PO Box 27105, Glasgow, G2 9JR.

Employment Tribunal Process

Once the Tribunal office has accepted the application the member will receive correspondence direct from the Tribunal and copies should be sent to the Legal Services Department. This usually happens prior to a decision being made regarding representation, and in such circumstances, the members must comply with the Tribunal orders. If the CWU is providing representation then the Union’s Solicitors or ET Panellist will notify the Tribunal Office and go on record at which point the Tribunal office will correspond direct with the Solicitors or ET Panellist.

In circumstances where a decision on representation has not yet been made, the Tribunal will still carry on with its procedures and it is at this point that Branches may need to assist the member with any Orders (instructions) given by the Tribunal office.

The following is a guide to those procedures.

If a claim is accepted by the Tribunal office, they will send a copy of the member’s ET1 claim form to the Respondent (the named employer or persons who the claim is against).

The Respondent must set out the grounds of resistance in the prescribed form, ET3, usually within 28 days, and send it back to the Tribunal office.

As soon as possible after the ET1 and ET3 have been accepted by the Tribunal, an Employment Judge will carry out an initial consideration of the documents to confirm whether there are arguable complaints and defences that can be considered by the Tribunal.

The Employment Judge may seek further information from the parties before reaching a decision. The Tribunal Judge may set a date for a Preliminary Hearing.

There are two types of Preliminary Hearings, known as,

  1. Case Management Discussions (CMD), and
  1. Pre Hearing Reviews (mini hearing) (PHR).

Branches should note that the Legal Services Department would not expect Branch Officials to attend PHRs, as decisions can be made on the day regarding the merits of the case. If a PHR is listed the Legal Services Department will make every effort to ensure the member has suitable advice. 

If, however, a CMD is listed, Branches should be able to assist our member.

A CMD is usually called to explore the issues of a case and set a timeline for the progression and administration of the claim by the Tribunal. The CMD can be arranged as a face to face meeting with the Judge, which is held in private, or, as in many cases, as a telephone conference.

A key part of the CMD is the need to complete a form known as Agenda For Case Management At Preliminary Hearing, which will be sent by the Tribunal office.

The form has to be completed by the Claimant and the Respondent. This form can be an agreed form with the Respondent (this is usually not possible), or, as two separate forms, which should be sent to the Tribunal Office and the Respondent/s no later than 2 days before the Preliminary Hearing.

It is essentially a time-tabling exercise, which enables the Tribunal to set dates by which pieces of work need to be completed in advance of the claim going to a full Tribunal Hearing.

Completing the form is an important part of the process, because it will prepare the member for the hearing, and the questions asked enable both parties to concentrate on the relevant issues, which include the correct name of the parties, the complaint, documents relied on, witnesses to be called, dates to avoid and the remedy (this will require the completion of a separate form known as the Claimant’s Schedule of Loss). Copies of both forms are attached at the appendix.

There are a number of specific case management powers the Employment Judge has, which include,

Power to order disclosure of documents and information

Power to order production of witness statements

Power to compel the attendance of a person at a hearing ( witness order) Power to add, substitute or remove a party from the proceeding

Power to strike out all or part of a claim or response

Power to make an unless order (can strike out the claim if either party fail to respond)

Power to make a deposit order (This is a monetary payment that a party has to pay if he/she pursues a weak claim)

Power to deal with nonpayment of a deposit order.

CLAIMANT’S SCHEDULE OF LOSS

This document is the one which causes our members the most concern, as it details the amount of compensation they wish to claim, as part of any settlement.

Most of the details required should already be available to our members, such as their basic pay, length of service, notice period, loss of earnings, etc.

The awards fall into 2 categories, as follows :-

Basic Award

Compensatory Award

These awards are calculated, applying a detailed formula, as detailed below. Some areas are more difficult to quantify, such as future pension loss. It is important to understand that the information supplied in the schedule of loss is only an estimate of what our members feel they are entitled to claim and, if they are unsure what amount to put down or if the figure is inaccurate, it does not matter, as details can be added later. In any case, it will be the Employment Judge who decides the level of compensation to award.

Basic Award

This is calculated in the same way as a statutory redundancy payment as follows:-

  • 1½ weeks’ pay for each year of employment in which the member was not below the age of 41;
  • 1 week’s pay for each year of employment in which the member not below the age of 22; and
  • ½ a week’s pay for each year of employment not within either of the above

The following should be noted:

  • For dismissals after 6th April 2023, a week’s pay is currently capped at £643 per week (gross); The maximum basic award is for a period of 20 years – the maximum award therefore being 20 x 1.5 x £643 = £19,290. Usually, the weekly cap is changed each year, so the member must check the weekly rate that was in place at the date of dismissal.

Compensatory Award

This award compensates for loss of earnings flowing from the unfair dismissal.

Bonus and commission payments will be included in any sum for loss of earnings, as well as basic salary.

The award is essentially based on the net loss of earnings and employment benefits until the member has found, or can reasonably be expected to find, alternative employment at a similar rate as previously.

Benefits include (but are not limited to)

  • pension losses;
  • loss of a company car;
  • loss of health insurance and life assurance;
  • bonuses

The loss of other contractual benefits may also be taken into consideration. There is a cap on the compensatory award for unfair dismissal claims, which currently stands at £105,707 or one year’s salary, if that is lower. This cap is usually increased at the beginning of April, so the member must check the figure in place at the time of dismissal.

Pre Hearing Review (PHR)

Preliminary Hearings are mini hearings, which may be held in public and either at the Employment Judge’s request or an application of one of the parties involved, to determine any preliminary issue, for example:

  1. Decide whether to strike out the whole or part of the claim or response
  2. Any substantive issue which may determine liability
  3. An issue as to jurisdiction (has the claim been submitted within the agreed time limits)
  4. Whether the employee was dismissed or not
  5. Whether the claimant was an employee; or
  6. Whether the claimant was disabled

A Tribunal must give 14 days’ notice if a Hearing is to determine a Preliminary issue and in all other cases, the tribunal must give reasonable notice.

Once the Preliminary Hearing has been concluded, the Tribunal will issue Case Management Orders, which will be sent direct to the member (the Claimant), or, a decision, depending on what the Hearing was called to determine. These Orders will detail what action need to be taken by the Claimant and/or the Respondent and the time scales for doing so. These Orders include requests for Further and Better Particulars of the Claimant’s claim, requests for Further and Better Particulars of the Respondent’s claim, the date upon which witness statements need to be exchanged between the Claimant and the Respondent, the date for disclosure of any relevant documentation, which can include medical notes and reports which are to be relied upon, the date and time for the preparation of the Tribunal bundle and a date and duration of the Tribunal Hearing.

Branches should be aware that there are consequences for the non-compliance of such orders, which will include a fine being imposed upon the person being in default. Non-compliance could lead to the claim being struck out.

In any event, if you are unsure about any issue contained within this guide, please contact the Legal Services Department, who will provide the necessary assistance.

Details contained within this LTB are for information purposes only and members should be made aware that it is not given as qualified legal advice. Such legal advice can only be provided by a solicitor.

If you have any further enquiries regarding the above then please contact Mr. Tony Rupa, Head of Legal Services, Communication Workers Union, 150 The Broadway, London, SW19 1RX. Telephone 0208 971 7444 or via email trupa@cwu.org

Yours sincerely

Tony Rupa

HEAD OF LEGAL SERVICES

Useful sources of information : www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment | www.acas.org.uk | www.equalityhumanrights.com

Attachments :

LTB 275 2023 – THE BRANCH OFFICERS & REPS GUIDE TO PROCESSING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS

LTB 275/23 – Attachment to Guide to Processing ET Claims

View Online

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑