Glyphosate – Weedkillers

To: All Branches

Dear Colleagues,

Glyphosate is a toxic herbicide used to kill weeds. Glyphosate is used in a large number of weedkillers. It is the most commonly used weedkiller in the world with about two-thirds of herbicide sales. It is sold by the original manufacturer, Monsanto, as “Roundup” although it is found in other brands such as Weedol, Bayer, Rosate and Rodeo. It is also used in a lot of supermarket and garden centre own-brands.

Is it dangerous?

There is no question that weedkillers containing Glyphosate are dangerous. If it gets on the skin it can cause irritation and dermatitis. It can also cause oral and throat discomfort if it is breathed in. Eye exposure may lead to mild conjunctivitis. If swallowed it may cause corrosion of the throat and can lead to kidney or liver failure.

It is also believed that it can cause cancer. In March 2015 the International Agency on research into Carcinogens (IARC) announced that Glyphosate probably caused a type of cancer called Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. This was based on a study of agricultural workers who were exposed to the chemical, although it was backed up by tests on animals. However it is not known whether the cancer is being caused by contact through the skin or through breathing it, or both. It is therefore necessary to try to prevent any workers coming into contact with Glyphosate.

Independent research indicates that Glyphosate is not only possibly carcinogenic, but that it also affects the body’s endocrine system – causing problems in the liver and kidneys. Industry manufacturers and testers dispute this.

Who is at risk?

Glyphosate is commonly used in agriculture and gardening in the UK. Workers that could be exposed will include parks staff, agricultural workers, gardeners, and some forestry workers. It is not only those who are using the chemical who may be at risk, but also those working around them when the herbicide is being applied.

What does the law say?

All substances that could be hazardous to health are covered by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH). These state that the employer must try to prevent exposure totally. If that is not possible they should control it so the risk of harm is ‘as low as is reasonably practicable’. That means that they should first see what can be done to avoid using any chemicals by changing how they work. If it has to be used they should look at less dangerous substitutes, and if not possible, make sure that they are protecting the worker through things such as introducing new methods of working such as automation, and if that can’t be done they should provide personal protective equipment free of charge. They also need to provide information and training for all those who use the chemical or who may be exposed.

Whether there is a risk and how it needs to be controlled is decided after a risk assessment. There is also a requirement for the employer to consult with workers, (through the Union health and safety representatives where they exist).

Herbicides are also covered by separate regulations which say that employers must:

• Take all reasonable precautions to protect human health and the environment;
• Confine the application of the pesticide to the crops or area to be treated;
• Ensure when using pesticides in certain specified areas, e.g. those used by the general public, that the amount of pesticide used and the frequency of use are as low as are reasonably practicable.

What does that mean for employers who use Glyphosate?

Given that the risks to the skin, lung and eyes have been known about for many years, employers should already have been taking action to prevent any contact to Glyphosate, even before there was evidence it causes cancer.

Now that there is new evidence that Glyphosate is likely to cause cancer, all employers must review their risk assessments, including their COSHH assessments. Where possible they should consider alternatives to the use of herbicides, but if that is not possible they must investigate whether there are safer alternatives. If there are alternatives then they should be introduced, regardless of whether they are more expensive. However they should not rush into substituting another herbicide for Glyphosate without ensuring that they know the risk from the substitute. All herbicides are likely to have some dangers to humans.

If they are going to continue to use Glyphosate then they should look at whether there are alternatives to how it is used now. Often it is sprayed from backpacks (which often leak) and are filled in an enclosed space. The employer must consider alternative ways of applying it and also look at how containers are filled, cleaned and the chemical stored and disposed of. They also need to provide training and information to the workers about the risk.

If, after that, any workers are still likely to come into contact with Glyphosate, they must provide protective clothing. That may include gloves, masks and protective overalls. This must be done free of charge, and arrangements need to be made for them to be stored and cleaned. The safety representatives should be involved in any discussion on the best protective equipment.

Employers should also be monitoring the health of all those who use Glyphosate (or any pesticide).

Role of Union health and safety representatives

No workers should be put at risk of exposure to any substance that can lead to cancer. Many employers will not know about the risks from Glyphosate, especially as the manufacturers still continue to insist there is no risk, despite the evidence. Health and safety representatives should make sure they bring the information to their attention.

Safety representatives must ensure that their employer reviews their risk assessments and shares the results with them. Safety Reps have the right to this information!

You should try to ensure that what the employer is doing is going to be effective in protecting your members. The measures outlined in the section on what the employer should do will help you in this, but if you need advice then you should contact your union.

Inform your members about what is happening, and why.

More information

Details of the IIRC study can be found at:

http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf

The HSE pesticides pages are at:

http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/guidance/industries/pesticides/home

Yours sincerely

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

18LTB561 Glyphosate – Weedkillers

TUC Biennial Safety Reps Survey Report 2018: “Focus On Health & Safety”

To: All Branches

Dear Colleagues,

The Survey 

This is the 12th biennial TUC survey of safety representatives. The report is analysed by senior TUC policy officials and union health and safety specialists in order to understand the changing experience of safety representatives at work and to help provide more support. The TUC also uses the survey report and outputs to inform public policy debates and in work with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

The TUC also wants Union Safety Representatives and Safety Committees to discuss and use the report to help with their ongoing work.

A total of 1,073 safety representatives responded to the questionnaire either on paper or online in the period March-July 2018, compared with 1,039 in the 2016 survey. The responses provide much information about the profile of safety representatives, the work they do to improve safety and the help (or otherwise) they get in this from employers and enforcement agencies.

In ‘Transport and Communications’, the industry covering the majority of CWU Safety Reps and members, twice as many Safety Representatives from Transport and Communications, including CWU Safety Reps, responded to the survey in 2018 compared with 2016, but their main concerns are little changed. Stress is still the most widespread concern but concern over long hours has slipped back from second to fifth place. Main concerns expressed by Safety Reps from this sector were; Stress 60% Bullying/harassment, 41% Slips Trips and Falls 39% Back strains 36% Long hours 35%.

Hazards 

The five most frequently cited hazards of main concern in 2018, across all Safety Reps in all sectors were stress, bullying/harassment, overwork, back strains and slips, trips and falls on the level. The first four are the same as in 2016 but slips, trips and falls has replaced long hours on the level in fifth place, returning the top five to the same position as in 2014. The most notable change since 2016 in the list of main concerns is the elevation of working alone, which jumped from 10th place to sixth place. One in four safety representatives (25%) cited it this year, compared with one in six (18%) two years ago.

• Stress – once again stands out as the main dominant health and safety hazard of concern, identified as a top-five hazard by 69% of safety representatives in the survey.
• Bullying/harassment – concern over this hazard has grown more widespread in recent years, with 45% of safety representatives putting it in their top five.
• Overwork – still in third place, with 36% of respondents citing it in 2018. 
• Slips, Trips and Falls – concern has risen slightly, from 28% to 31%.
• Violence and threats – 23% citing it in 2018.
• Managing health and safety – 8 in 10 safety representatives (80%) say their employer has conducted formal risk assessments but one in five safety reps felt they were inadequate. Fewer than half (47%) of all respondents in the survey felt their employer had conducted adequate risk assessments. 
• Safety representatives’ rights – There has been a welcome increase in the number of employers who are automatically consulting health and safety representatives on health and safety issues, but it is still only 28% rather than the 100% that it should be. However, one in seven of all safety representatives in the survey say management has at some time refused them time off for training. 21% are never automatically consulted by their employer over health, safety and welfare matters – although that is down from the 28% saying so in 2016. 28% are frequently automatically consulted. This will continue to be a problem until such time as employers start to recognise the value of having union health and safety representatives.
• Enforcement – The decline in inspection activity was once more reflected in the responses. The 2018 survey indicates that inspections by health and safety enforcement agencies remain low, and are perhaps worsening. Over half (52%) of safety representatives say their workplace has never, as far as they know, been inspected by a health and safety inspector, compared with 46% in 2016. Just 22% said there had been an inspection within the last 12 months (24% in 2016). Even amongst the workplace that received an inspection from health and safety enforcement, only 30% of the union health and safety representatives were able to speak to an inspector directly, despite all inspectors being expected to contact any health and safety representatives. The continued reduction in regular, proactive inspections by HSE and LAs makes the monitoring and subsequent improvement of workplace health and safety even more difficult to manage and the TUC, CWU and other Unions will continue to call for an increase in the number of inspections and for the HSE and local authorities to ensure that all inspectors automatically insist in meeting health and safety inspectors where they exist.
• OH Services – There have been some positive trends in the types of OH services provided, including more widespread access to rehabilitation and more common provision of advice on prevention.

A copy of the final report is attached for your information.

Yours sincerely

Dave Joyce
National Health, Safety & Environment Officer

18LTB557 TUC Biennial Safety Reps Survey Report 2018 Focus On Health & Safety

TUC Safety Reps Survey Report 2018