PCS DISPUTE – URGENT APPEAL FOR SUPPORT

PCS DISPUTE – URGENT APPEAL FOR SUPPORT 

The General Secretary of PCS, Mark Serwotka has contacted all TUC affiliates to seek urgent assistance in support of the union’s long running campaign against the plans to privatise two thirds of staff at the National Gallery. I attach a copy of the letter for your information.

 

PCS members have taken over 50 days of strike action over the last few months and more is planned from 11th August 2015. The CWU will be making a national donation to the hardship fund and we would encourage branches to do likewise.

 

Direct payments can be sent via bank transfer to sort code: 08-60-01 – account no: 20169002 or cheques to PCS Culture Media and Sport Association, c/o PCS North West Region, Jack Jones House, 1 Islington, Liverpool, L3 8EG.

 

If you have any enquiries on this LTB, these should be addressed to the General Secretary’s Office at gsoffice@cwu.org quoting the reference GS17.4/LTB 530/15.

 

Yours sincerely

 

​​​ ​​

 

Dave Ward​​​​​​

General Secretary

   

All CWU Postal BranchesCWU Area Delivery Representatives CWU Delivery Reference GroupCWU Walk Design Group 

 All CWU Postal Branches

CWU Area Delivery Representatives 

CWU Delivery Reference Group

CWU Walk Design Group

 

Dear Colleague

 

Area Delivery Representative Briefings – October 2015

 

A further series of ADR briefings have been arranged as detailed below. Every conceivable effort should be made by Area Delivery Representatives to attend one of these briefings, given the nature of the agenda items which will be published in due course.

 

 

Date: Wednesday 21st October 2015

Time: 11:00 – 14:00

 

Venue: Edinburgh Royal Overseas League,  

              Overseas House, 100 Princes

              Street, Edinburgh, EH2 3AB

 

Date: Thursday 22nd October 2015

Time: 11:00 – 14:00

 

Venue: Post Office Club, 26

             Marygate, City Centre, York

             YO30 7BH

 

Date: Friday 23rd October 2015

Time: 11:00 – 14:00

 

Venue: Birmingham & District Branch, 47

              Summer Lane, Hockley,

              Birmingham, B19 3TH

Date: Wednesday 28th October 2015

Time: 11:00 – 14:00

 

Venue PCS Union

           160 Falcon Rd, London    

           SW11 2LN

 

 

Branches are responsible for the travel and other associated costs for this type of meeting and, where an ADR has responsibility for an area which covers more than one Branch, these costs should be shared proportionately. However, if a Branch has any particular financial difficulties for these specific briefings and a case for assistance is made to this department this will be given the fullest consideration. Any such requests should be made prior to the meeting taking place.

 

Any enquiries to Bob Gibson’s Office, quoting reference 535

Email address: hnutley@cwu.org or Mstewart@cwu.org

 

Yours sincerely
Bob Gibson
COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION 

URGENT INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS 9

CWU Assistant Secretary

Sunday Services – Enquiry Offices

Sunday Services – Enquiry Offices 

Branches and Representatives will be aware of the national trial currently taking place regarding the above, and that we agreed to an extension of the current trial until 28th June 2015 to allow more time for national discussions to take place and reach an acceptable way forward.

 

Those discussions have become more protracted than anticipated and are at a critical stage of negotiation. Branches need to be aware that there are some fundamental differences between the CWU and Royal Mail that impact on existing terms and conditions and until those differences are resolved the CWU will not be supporting any extension of Sunday opening, or the introduction of new services at Enquiry Offices.

 

A further meeting has been arranged with Royal Mail on Tuesday 18th August 2015. Branches will be updated ASAP following that meeting.

 

In the meantime any approaches from Royal Mail regarding Sunday Opening, general opening times, and the introduction of new services should be reported to your CWU Divisional Representative and/or the CWU Outdoor Department without delay for further guidance. No agreement should be given to any proposal that encompasses any of the initiatives referred to above and should be resisted utilising the IR Framework if necessary.

Any enquiries to Bob Gibson’s Office quoting reference 530. Email address: hnutley@cwu.org or mstewart@cwu.org

Yours sincerely

Bob Gibson
COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION 

URGENT INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS

CWU Assistant Secretary – Outdoor  

RE: MR BOB EVANS RETIRED MEMBER AND FORMER BRANCH SECRETARY

RE: MR BOB EVANS RETIRED MEMBER AND FORMER BRANCH SECRETARY 

It is with great sadness that I write to inform you that Bob Evans, CWU Retired member and trade union officer and activist for over 50 years, passed away peacefully on the 8th August 2015 at the Luton and Dunstable Hospital.

 

Bob served the union as branch secretary of the Luton Post Office Engineering Union (POEU) Branch. Through various mergers in the region he continued to be branch secretary for the Luton and North Herts Branch and the Beds Herts and Bucks Branch. Over the years Bob also held various District and regional positions. He was a retired member of the Central Counties & Thames Valley Branch.  

 

His dedication and commitment to the union was recognised by the CWU on his retirement when he was awarded the union’s Gold Badge.

 

Bob was a very well respected Branch officer and was also held in very high regard nationally. He will be sadly missed by all his friends and colleagues in the union.

 

At this sad time our thoughts are of course with Bob’s family and friends and to those we convey our deepest sympathies.

 

The funeral will take place on Wednesday 2nd September 2015 at 3.15pm in the Vale Cemetery & Crematorium, Butterfield Road, Luton, LU2 8DD. Refreshments will be available afterwards at Hilton Garden Inn, Butterfield Business Park, Hitchin Road, Luton, LU2 8DL.

 

If you have any enquiries on this LTB, these should be addressed to the General Secretary’s Office at gsoffice@cwu.org quoting the reference GS1.1/LTB 527/15.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

​​​ ​​

 

Dave Ward​​​​​​

General Secretary

           

Delivery – Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Verification + Terms of Reference   

Delivery – Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Verification + Terms of Reference   

We have agreed to a review of the existing set of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) which were first developed using “Unipart” principles in 2003 using a 95% of the people 95% of the time rule. In many instances this has led to SOPs only providing an overview of activities/key tasks. For full operational details various other supporting literatures need to be referenced which has brought about in some instances confusion and misunderstanding.

 

As part of the on-going improvement work we are undertaking, the SOPs are being updated to provide improved clarity and depth of detail in a more visual format, as it is in the best interests of all parties for employees to understand the correct procedures/processes within the Delivery operation.

 

Additionally, simple to follow instructions, precise descriptions and visual aids in the form of pictures showing the procedures/processes can be used as a training aid for new entrants, individuals who may need re-training or transferees from different functions.

 

As such we have agreed that a verification process will be conducted in West Wickham, Orpington and Basildon Delivery Offices. These Offices have been selected on the basis of their geographical locations and range of size, and is also based on the ease of access for those individuals involved in constructing, collating, designing and submitting the final designs.

 

The overall aim is to produce a set of documents that are easily understood and can be used in any Delivery Office nationally which show how particular procedures/processes should be carried out.

 

In the three verification units stated above, local involvement from the Delivery Office Manager, Line Manager (s) and local CWU Representatives is key and they will be invited to take part in the verification process and encouraged to get involved. In addition a joint questionnaire will be developed by the National Standard Operating Procedures Group to gauge feedback and suggestions from these offices which will then used to construct a potential ‘new’ and agreed Standard Operating Procedure format.

 

The outputs from the verification process will be reviewed regularly at the SOP Working Group to understand whether there is an improvement in the understanding, usage and design of the proposed new format for SOPs.

 
COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION 

URGENT INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS

9

Any enquiries to Bob Gibson’s Office, quoting reference 530.07

Email address: hnutley@cwu.org or mstewart@cwu.org

 

Yours Sincerely

Bob Gibson

CWU Assistant Secretary – Outdoor

 

National Agreement On The Use Of Telemetry Equipment Within Regional Logistics (Area Distribution) – Telemetry Training Implementation Plan

National Agreement On The Use Of Telemetry Equipment Within Regional Logistics (Area Distribution) – Telemetry Training Implementation Plan 

Branches and representatives will recall that LTB 056/15 reported on an agreement and trial activity that had been agreed in regard to the use of Telemetry equipment within Regional Logistics (Area Distribution). Further to this LTB 305/15 provided information in relation to the status of the use of Telemetry equipment and that deployment had been delayed until outstanding issues relating to the associated training package had been concluded. In particular the absence of face to face in-cab instruction on the use of the equipment was a concern along with the lack of a structured deployment plan for each site.

 

Following the initial trial at Nottingham further trial activity on a revised training package has been taking place at Leeds, Plymouth and Mount Pleasant Distribution Units. Following the conclusion of this activity the department can now report that the attached Training Implementation Plan to support the telemetry deployment has been agreed and was endorsed by the Postal Executive at its meeting on the 4th August 2015.

 

Branches and representatives are asked to note that the attached will ensure that the Telemetry training is deployed in a manageable and consistent manner across the Regional Logistics (Area Distribution) network nationally and incorporates the following:

 

• Enshrines the CWU at every stage

• All distribution representatives will receive full training in all aspects of the equipment and systems including the traffic office elements, which will ensure that our representatives are fully equipped to deal with any issues arising from the deployment.

• In-cab training which will take the driver through a “nominal duty” from log in to log out and ensures that tuition is received on all aspects of the system and the necessary responsibilities of the driver at each stage.

• Completion of training at each site is a matter for agreement and joint sign off.

• The establishment of a joint Post Implementation Review (PIR) to pick up any issues or learning points.

The department now believe that any issues in relation to the quality of the training and the process for deploying it have been resolved and that the deployment of the Telemetry equipment can proceed.  

 

Representatives are therefore asked to engage with their managers in line with the terms of the National Agreement Between Royal Mail Logistics and the CWU on the Deployment and Use of Telemetry Equipment Within Regional Logistics (Area Distribution) and the attached Training Implementation Plan.

 

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to: Joe Malone, Acting Assistant Secretary, e-mail: dwyatt@cwu.org or shayman@cwu.org quoting reference number: 518.02

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Joe Malone

Acting Assistant Secretary

 

 REGIONAL LOGISTICS – TELEMETRY TRAINING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

 

 

Further to the completion of trial activity at Nottingham, Plymouth, Leeds and Mount Pleasant Distribution Units discussions have been continuing between Royal Mail and the CWU in relation to a revised training plan to effectively support the deployment of the Microlise telemetry equipment in the Royal Mail MGV fleet. Those discussions have culminated in the following defined approach for the delivery of a training package being agreed.  

 

The phased process described below will provide a template for the consistent delivery of both agreed training materials and in-cab tuition and support in regard to Mircolise telemetry equipment.

 

 

Phase Zero:

 

1. The Lead Distribution Manager and CWU Area Distribution Representative will meet the designated Telemetry Superuser for the site to discuss and identify the Telemetry Trainers. It is expected that in units with Area Distribution Workplace Coaches that they will be the primary resource, which will be supplemented as required by Managers, CWU Representatives. Where there remains a shortfall of available trainers, volunteers will be sought from the Professional Driver or Traffic Office functions.

 

2. Once the Telemetry Trainers have been identified and agreed, arrangements for their training by the Superuser will be scheduled. To ensure that this training is delivered at pace appropriate release will be agreed for all affected to attend and fully participate.

 

3. To ensure the widest understanding of the Training packages and materials, the Superuser will also be available to provide training to the CWU Representatives at the site, even where they have not been identified as a Telemetry Trainer.

 

 

Phase One:

 

1. As defined above all Trainers and CWU Representatives will complete both the driver in-cab and the Traffic Office training packages. Once this has been completed the Lead Distribution Manager and CWU Area Distribution Representative will sign off the process to confirm that the site is ready to deploy the training package.

 

2. Local Distribution Managers and the Local CWU Representative will review existing 318’s to ensure that they accurately reflect the current state. Once complete the Lead Distribution Manager and the CWU Area Distribution Representative or nominated deputy will sign off the data set. The agreed 318 set will then be used to populate the Telemetry RSL. 

 

3. To avail the full functionality of the system during the in-cab training a nominal RSL/Geofence will be agreed and created.

 

 

Phase Two:

 

1. The Training plan will be scheduled and agreed based on 100% driver participation. Training will be scheduled to take place in duty time however should this not be practical alternative arrangements will be agreed to ensure all drivers are able to receive the training. It is recognised that the size of the unit/number of drivers will be taken into account when agreeing timescales. However, both parties will aim to complete this at pace.

 

2. Date for training to commence and finish to be agreed.

 

3. Telemetry system to be switched on and the RSL uploaded, including the designated RSL training site.

 

 

Phase Three:

 

1. Driver training delivered in line with agreed plan.

 

2. Drivers will use the Telemetry equipment from the point that they have been trained.

 

3. Lead Distribution Manager and CWU Area Distribution Representative will review the training plan on a weekly basis and will sign off the plan when training has been completed.

 

 

Phase Four:

 

Following the completion of the training plan a full deployment will be agreed in line with the National Telemetry Agreement.

 

Drivers will be asked to feedback any faults regarding RSL/Geo-fence via an issue log kept within the traffic office. These issues will be addressed as BAU by the Superuser and the Local CWU Representative and reviewed on a weekly basis by the Lead Distribution Manager and the Area Distribution Representative along with any other deployment issues.

 

A Post Implementation Review (PIR) undertaken by the Lead Distribution Manager and CWU Area Distribution Representative will take place six weeks following the completion of the training plan.

 

Any issues of interpretation of this process will be referred to the Area Distribution Working Group (ADWG) for resolution.

 
Euan McMurdo ​​Joe Malone

Director Royal Mail Logistics​​​ ​​Acting Assistant Secretary                                                                      

Royal Mail Group​​​ ​​CWU

 

 

Date: 3rd August 2015 ​

 
 
 

 

TO: ALL BRANCHES WITH POSTAL MEMBERS RE: COGNOLINK CONSULTANTS

RE: COGNOLINK CONSULTANTS 

I am writing to alert branches to the activity of Cognolink a market research company based in New York. Under the title “Consulting Opportunity” Cognolink has written to a number of our postal organisers to say they are “working on behalf of a New York based hedge fund interested in the UK postal industry and labour relations in particular” and asking them to take part in “a paid 45 – 90 minute phone consultation”.

 

While market research is a long established activity in the commercial world, it is clear that the privatisation of Royal Mail and the liberalisation of the UK postal market is encouraging interest from potential investors, including massive US hedge funds looking for a profitable rate of return on any investment.

 

Aside from questioning the business motives of hedge funds and their future interest in the UK postal sector, there is clearly a risk that any Royal Mail employee taking part in any paid private consultation of this sort could be in breach of RM’s Code of Business Standards by potentially disclosing confidential business information. The Code (which is attached, see pages 15-17) states that employees must “not communicate with the media, shareholders or analysts unless they have been specifically authorised to do so” and that “RM employees with access to inside or potentially inside information must keep it strictly confidential and treat in accordance with Royal Mail’s Royal Mail’s Continuous Disclosure and Communications Policy”. Providing sensitive company and market information to hedge fund investors could also constitute a contravention of the UK’s competition rules. Both Ofcom and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) have competition law powers and will take action against companies who are acting on a way that damages fair competition.

 

In light of these concerns, we are writing to all CWU Branches to alert you to Cognolink’s activity and ask you not to participate in any consultations. We also intend to alert Royal Mail to these developments, warning them about the potential risks to the business and to report this activity to Ofcom in the context of their obligation to ensure fair competition in postal services.

 

 

 

 

 

Against this backdrop, all Branches should ensure that the content of this LTB are circulated and brought to the attention of all Representatives and members.

 

Branches are encouraged to alert the DGS (P) Department of any future requests from Cognolink. Any queries about the content of this LTB should be addressed to the DGS (P) Department quoting reference LTB 516/15.

 

Yours Sincerely, 

 

 

 

 

 

Terry Pullinger

Deputy General Secretary (Postal)

 

 

REPORT ON ROYAL MAIL GROUP AGM – 23RD JULY 2015

REPORT ON ROYAL MAIL GROUP AGM – 23RD JULY 2015 

 

Further to LTB 476/15 which contained information for branches regarding the RMG AGM. Please find attached for your information a summary report from the meeting held the 23rd July in Cardiff.

 

In addition to the attached report a breakdown of the decision and voting on the various propositions consider at the meeting can be located via the following link.

 

Click to access Results%20of%20the%20AGM%2023%20July%202015.pdf

 

Any queries about the contents of this LTB should be addressed to the DGS (P) Department quoting reference LTB 499/15.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terry Pullinger​​

Deputy General Secretary (Postal)​​

 

  

Royal Mail AGM, 23rd July 2015

 

Introduction

 

Royal Mail’s AGM 2015 was held on 23rd July in Cardiff. There were approximately one hundred people in attendance and the meeting lasted one hour, with most of the time dedicated to answering questions from shareholders. Chairman Donald Brydon and CEO Moya Greene opened the meeting with an overview of Royal Mail’s progress and future strategy, reflecting its annual report and financial statements 2014-15.  

 

Chairman’s report

 

Donald Brydon reported that he will be stepping down as Chairman on 1st September 2015 after six and a half years in the role, to be replaced by Peter Long who is currently a non-executive director. He called 2014-15 a ‘landmark year’ for Royal Mail – its first full financial year as a private company, in which it has faced the challenge of an increasingly competitive market. He said Royal Mail has been investing in improving its efficiency, growth and innovation, and that this is reflected in improved operating profits and increased margins.

 

Chief Executive Officer’s Report

 

Moya Greene reported that Royal Mail has been recognised as one of the UK’s most trusted brands, and that customer satisfaction had improved over the year. Operating profit in 2014/15 was in line with expectations largely due to attention to efficiency and cost control which had secured a better than expected 1% reduction in UK costs. She said that cost savings have a human face including job losses, and that Royal Mail would continue to work very closely with the unions to make these difficult changes.

 

Moya Greene thanked Donald Brydon for his work in helping to transform the company and said she was looking forward to continuing that transformation work with Peter Long. She noted Royal Mail’s success in achieving a 2.5% improvement in productivity over the last year and said the company is now poised to step up the pace of change and drive not only efficiency but also growth and innovation.

 

CWU Questions

 

There were five questions posed by local and regional CWU representatives on behalf of the union, as follows:

 

1. The CWU asked the board whether the company remained committed to the principles set out in the Agenda for Growth agreement in respect of maintaining decent employee terms and conditions post privatisation and in an increasingly competitive market.  

 

Donald Brydon replied that the company’s relationship with the union is now vastly improved to the credit of both management and the union. He said that a new phase of discussions with the union was beginning and therefore it would not be wise to expand on his comments in any detail. However, he said Royal Mail is proud that it pays people properly and does not use zero hours contracts and that is at the heart of what it wants to achieve.

 

2. The CWU asked how Royal Mail is going to ensure that the public continues to have a voice in how the postal service is run as the government prepares to sell off its remaining stake in the company.  

 

Donald Brydon responded saying that it is the government’s decision to sell Royal Mail, not the company’s, but he said that the way the public has a voice is as customers. He believes that customer influence is the strongest form of pressure people can bring to the company. He also said Royal Mail is proud to be the company selected to deliver the universal service obligation (USO).

 

3. The CWU asked whether Royal Mail supports the union’s People’s Post campaign to prevent cherry picking in the postal market and a race to the bottom on employment standards.  

 

Moya Greene answered by saying it would be wrong to impede the independence of the CWU’s view on its campaign, but that Royal Mail is on record saying that the USO is fragile and that the cherry picking of easy to serve areas means the financeability and sustainability of the USO will be threatened. She said the company agrees with the CWU’s position on cherry picking and is on public record with respect to that.

 

4. The CWU highlighted the unfair treatment of part time staff who regularly work beyond their contracted hours but are only paid their contracted hours as holiday pay. We asked the board how the company can justify this.

 

Moya Greene responded by saying the vast majority of its positions are full time but that the company needs some part time staff to provide a measure of flexibility due to the way the business is structured. She said Royal Mail offers the best pay and conditions in the industry and they are proud to do so because they enjoy the loyalty of their people. Moya Greene said she was not prepared to get into the detail of the issue, but that the company has ongoing meetings with the unions and if there is a concern it will be raised at those meetings.

 

The CWU followed up by saying that the issue does get raised locally but that nothing is done. Moya responded by acknowledging the point and indicating that it had been noted.

 

5. In light of a government review next year of the current USO, the CWU asked whether Royal Mail supports the existing minimum requirements of the USO and will not be calling for any reduction to those provisions.

 

Donald Brydon answered by stating that Royal Mail is not seeking a downgrading of the USO and that they are happy to be the company that delivers the USO. His answer was brief, saying he could not be any clearer than that.

 

Other questions from shareholders

 

A number of other questions were raised by shareholders that are of interest to the CWU.

 

 

• A private shareholder asked what Royal Mail’s strategy was to capitalise on the collapse of City Link and the poor rates of customer satisfaction in the courier sector. Donald Brydon replied that customer satisfaction at Royal Mail is rising and that its strategy is to improve satisfaction and quality further so that it can outperform its competitors.

 

• Another shareholder asked what consequences might result from Ofcom’s fundamental review of the regulation of Royal Mail. Donald Brydon answered that it was a matter for Ofcom to set out its plans. He said that Royal Mail is engaged in dialogue with the regulator on this issue but he did not offer any information or opinion on the potential outcomes of the review.

 

• The issue of executive pay was raised by one private shareholder who singled out Donald Brydon’s 2015 salary of £210,000 as being excessive, calling it a ‘disgrace’, particularly given the role was part time. He highlighted the disparity between pay on the board and that of part time staff at Royal Mail. Donald Brydon said that his pay and that of other board members is set by the remuneration committee, and he said it was standard practice for the Chair of a listed company to be a part time role.

 

• A shareholder who was also an employee said that in the area where he works there are a lot of ‘casuals’ employed at the company who were not properly trained in their role. He said that a commitment to training and development for these staff would be helpful. Moya Greene acknowledged the point and indicated she would give it some attention.

 

• A question was posed by an individual shareholder about why Royal Mail continued to provide first and second class delivery services when in their view it would be more efficient to simply provide one standard service. Donald Brydon responded that customers have made it clear they want both first and second class services and that Royal Mail will succeed by meeting customer needs.

 

• There was a question about whether it was prudent to use shareholders’ money to fund political donations. Donald Brydon replied that the company does not make donations to individual political parties but that the passing of Resolution 15 on what is legally termed ‘political donations’ would authorise Royal Mail to fund its political activities such as lobbying at party conferences.

 

Resolutions

 

Following questions, the Chair moved on to the resolutions which are set out in the Notice of AGM and recommended by the Directors as being in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. The results received from votes cast in advance of the meeting were displayed, with each resolution overwhelmingly supported. Individual shareholders present were asked to complete and hand in their voting cards after the meeting.

 

Donald Brydon then closed the meeting saying what a privilege it had been to be Chairman of Royal Mail, calling it an unusual company which was a real business combined with a real social purpose. He said he believed there was more ‘togetherness’ in the company today than there has been at any time.  

 

 

 

 

Orna Ni-Chionna, non-executive director, thanked Donald for his contribution saying that he had done what was right for the company and that it had been transformed for the better under his leadership.

 

Moya Greene, Peter Long and other members of the board made themselves available to the audience for questions over tea and coffee both before and after the meeting.

 

The results of the votes were published on the afternoon of 23rd July, with each resolution being carried. They are available at the following link:

 

http://www.royalmailgroup.com/sites/default/files/Results%20of%20the%20AGM%2023%20July%202015.pdf  

 

 

 

CWU

23rd July 2015

 

Joint Statement Between Royal Mail And The CWU Covering Tracked 24 High Volume Extended Collection LATs At NDC 

Joint Statement Between Royal Mail And The CWU Covering Tracked 24 High Volume Extended Collection LATs At NDC 

Branches and representatives will be aware that Royal Mail and the CWU are working together in order to develop mutual interest solutions and factor into them opportunities to deliver on the core commitments contained in the Agenda for Growth, Stability and Long Term Success Agreement.

 

That agreement recognised the need for a greater focus on growth via introducing enhanced customer offerings on current product range, creating growth through better utilisation of our existing pipeline and exploring more radical solutions.  

 

It has been decided to introduce an improved collection option from Monday to Friday which will allow our customers to process orders later into the day and get the item to the consumer faster.

 

This positive development will enable Royal Mail to compete for more of this business and in doing so it is hoped to build and retain traffic volumes that might have otherwise been lost to other competitors.

 

It is against this backdrop that a Joint Statement covering the introduction of Tracked 24 High Volume Extended Collection LATs at NDC has been agreed and is attached for the information of Branches and representatives.  

 

The improvements to Monday to Friday collections and distribution for high volume Tracked 24 customers accessing the National Distribution Centre (NDC) will incorporate the following from mid August/early September 2015 and will put the business on par with its competitors:

 

• NDC extend LATs by 1 hour from 20:00 to 21:00 for National next day coverage;

• NDC extend LATs by 1.5 hours from 22:00 to 23:30 for core coverage;

• Core will now include parts of Scotland, i.e. EH1-17 & G1-84

 

The attached Joint Statement provides information in relation to the operational changes. The main effect of this service change will be experienced by NDC and the Mail Centre operated distribution services at the following sites:

 

• Edinburgh MC

• Glasgow MC

• Bristol MC

• Cardiff MC

• Carlisle MC

• Dorset MC

• Exeter MC

• Ipswich MC

• Manchester MC

• Newcastle MC

• Norwich MC

• Portsmouth MC

• Southampton MC

• Swansea MC

 

Branches are requested to ensure that this LTB and its attachment are circulated to the attention of all affected representatives as a matter of urgency.

 

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to Joe Malone, Acting Assistant Secretary, e-mail: dwyatt@cwu.org or shayman@cwu.org quoting reference number: 709.02

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Joe Malone

Acting Assistant Secretary

JOINT STATEMENT BETWEEN ROYAL MAIL AND THE CWU COVERING TRACKED 24 HIGH VOLUME EXTENDED COLLECTION LATs AT NDC

 

 

Background

 

Royal Mail (RM) and the Communication Workers Union (CWU) are working together in developing key business policies, mutual interest solutions and a new culture, all of which are at the core of the commitments in the Agenda for Growth, Stability and Long Term Success Agreement.

 

Both parties recognise that creating the right joint working environment is key to the success of the business and the commitment to provide employment security in all operational functions of the business.

 

Both parties recognise the pressures of the increasingly competitive and rapidly evolving environment and are committed to the strategic objective of creating and developing an agenda for traffic, product and revenue retention & growth, as a positive alternative to simply managing decline across the RM operational network and defining a tangible competitive response.

 

Introduction

 

Parcels competition continues to increase with competitors expanding their networks and delivering enhanced customer services. Royal Mail is responding to the market challenges through a number of initiatives designed to defend and grow revenue & traffic, and to extend Royal Mail service capabilities.

 

Online retail is increasingly becoming 24/7 with shoppers ordering later into the evening. Retailers are now picking and packing their orders later into the evening to improve delivered service times. Therefore we are introducing an improved collection option for Royal Mail Tracked 24 high volume to retailers, which will allow our customers to process orders later into the day and get the item to the consumer faster.

 

We are introducing these changes so that we can compete more effectively with competitors who are already offering this facility. These changes will enable Royal Mail to compete for business we would otherwise not have access to and in addition we can retain volumes that might otherwise go to our competitors. This is good for our company and our people.

 

What We Are Changing

 

Against that backdrop we are improving our weekday collections and distribution for high volume Tracked 24 customers accessing the National Distribution Centre (NDC) i.e.

 

a) NDC extend LATs by 1 hour from 20:00 to 21:00 for national next day coverage;

b) NDC extend LATs by 1.5 hours from 22:00 to 23:30 for core coverage;

c) Core will now include parts of Scotland, i.e. EH1-17 & G1-84;

d) Available Monday to Friday.

 

This puts us on par with our competitors.

 

 

 

When Are We Changing

 

Currently the sales teams are being briefed and customers will be able to access this enhancement to collection from mid August/early September 2015.

 

Operational Impact

 

This enhancement to the service will have the following impact on operational units:  

 

a) Vehicle Operating Centres will plan and resource T24HV customer collections according to customer demand;

b) National Distribution Centre will plan and align resource to later collection arrivals and process to revised LAT T24HV workplan 23:30;

c) An investment in despatch to final wave of T24 Mail Centre services (including 12 new shuttle services);

d) Mail Centres operating 12 new shuttle services from NDC departing 01:30;

e) Services timed to connect with MC to DO and MPU feeders with no changes, apart from the EH1-17 and G1-48 postcodes where connectivity to the DO’s will be supported with additional feeder services (where current CSS waves cannot be utilised);

f) G & EH – Operate 1 shuttle service to Carlisle Mail Centre for mails transfer;

g) Glasgow Deliveries operate up to 35 DO feeder runs into Glasgow Mail Centre to depart 07:50 (fewer if CSS feeder runs already exist);

h) Edinburgh Deliveries operate up to 10 DO feeder runs into Edinburgh Mail Centre to depart 08:11 (fewer if CSS feeder runs already exist).

 

The introduction of any revised duty/attendance arrangements will be negotiated at local level in line with the IR Framework to meet customer collection times.

 

This service enhancement does not affect any part of the National workplan, including deliveries.

 

The change of service will have a minor impact in regard to Network services which will be dealt with in line with existing agreements.

 

Involvement

 

Timely engagement will take place between local managers and CWU IR representatives in the process for taking on new customers and appropriate Union release time will be provided for the CWU representatives to ensure meaningful involvement.

 

Any questions of interpretation, implementation, or application of this Joint Statement shall be referred to the respective Headquarters for resolution.

 Joe Malone​Francis Williams

Acting Assistant Secretary​Head of Parcel Design

CWU​Royal Mail

 

Date: ​4th August 2015
 

 

Royal Mail Specialist Services (RMSS) Road Traffic Accident Procedure (RTA)

Postal Branches with RMSS MembersRegional Organisers

RMSS Representatives

 

 

Dear Colleague

 

Royal Mail Specialist Services (RMSS) Road Traffic Accident Procedure (RTA)

 

Branches and representatives will be aware that a revised Royal Mail RTA agreement was concluded in 2012. At that time the Royal Mail Specialist business unit, while being a standalone unit since 2010, was still aligned to Royal Mail with regard to terms and conditions and as such the intention was that this agreement would hold the field in regard to accidents involving our members based in RMSS.  

 

Separate discussions have since taken place with Parcelforce in respect of a RTA agreement, which was agreed and issued in 2014. Subsequently, RMSS management approached the department suggesting that the Parcelforce agreement would in fact be more suited to the operational realities in RMSS and requested that they be aligned to that agreement instead of the RM RTA agreement.

 

There is no doubt that with regard to duty structures and in particular the very limited availability of non driving work, that the RMSS model is very similar to the situation in Parcelforce, which originally defined the requirement for a separate agreement in that business unit. Equally, in the view of the department and given the status of RMSS as a separate bargaining unit it was not appropriate to adopt a specific Parcelforce agreement and deploy it across RMSS.  

 

Discussions with RMSS concluded with the attached agreement being achieved which is identical in almost every respect to the aforementioned Parcelforce agreement and includes the right of appeal against blameworthy decisions in every case. Changes mostly update terminology to ensure that it is representative of the current state, i.e. Accident Management Centre changes to Lex Autolease.    

 

The only substantive amendment between the agreements is in the change of reference from 1-2-1 meetings to face to face, which was determined as a relevant change given that the right to CWU representation in most cases would mean that the meeting was not in fact a 1-2-1.

 

With this agreement we have ensured that the standards achieved in the previous RTA agreements now apply to and protect all operational drivers across Royal Mail Group in regard to the following:

➢ A commitment that a mechanistic use of the conduct code is not appropriate as a means of managing road traffic accidents

 

➢ Removal from driving duties must only be undertaken on the basis that it is preventative in relation to issues of capability

 

➢ Clear guidance on the use of precautionary removal from driving following an accident

 

➢ The ability for the driver to request temporary reassignment following an accident

 

➢ The introduction of a review/appeal against blameworthy decisions

 

➢ The right to Union representation at all formal stages of the process including Fact Finding

 

➢ The obligation on the business to provide and agree a tailored training/support programme with the driver following an accident

 

➢ The achievement of an agreed mechanism for a return to driving duties following redeployment where driving performance has been restored, even where the redeployment was to another part of Royal Mail Group.

 

It has been agreed that the new RMSS RTA procedure will go live from the 10th August 2015. It had been hoped to arrange a joint launch event prior to the go live date in a similar manner to that previously agreed for the Parcelforce launch. Unfortunately it has not been possible to find a mutually acceptable date with RMSS senior management and in the view of the department it is not in our interests to further delay the launch. We have provisionally booked a date for this launch event in September and Branches and representatives will be notified when arrangements have been concluded.

 

Branches and representatives are requested to ensure that the content of this LTB and the attached National Agreement are given the widest publicity and brought to the immediate attention of all CWU members employed by RMSS on driving duties. Further information on the deployment and activity associated with this will be circulated in due course.

 

Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to: Joe Malone, Acting Assistant Secretary, e-mail: dwyatt@cwu.org or shayman@cwu.org quoting reference number: 218.19.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Joe Malone

Acting Assistant Secretary

 

 

National Agreement between Royal Mail Specialist Services (RMSS) and the CWU on the

Road Traffic Accident Procedure 2015

 

 

Background

 

Royal Mail Specialist Services (RMSS) and the Communication Workers Union are working together in developing key business policies, mutual interest solutions and a new culture, which is at the core of all the commitments contained in the BT2010 Agreement and the recently endorsed Agenda for Growth, Stability and Long Term Success Agreement.

 

Both parties recognise that creating the right IR and collaborative working environment is key to the general success of RMSS, and are committed to achieving the above by resolving all local issues and concerns across the wider operation without recourse to disagreement wherever possible.  

 

A key component of the joint vision and agenda going forward is the reaffirmation of the joint commitments aimed at improving road safety, included the agreed introduction of a Royal Mail Specialist Services Road Traffic Accident Procedure.

 

This compliments the joint development of a range of initiatives designed to reduce occupational road risk through improvement in drivers, awareness, skills, knowledge and confidence.

Principles

 

Our vehicles deliver in every part of the country 6 days a week, throughout the year. As such we have a duty of care not only to our employees but to other road users and the general public. We recognise that the pressures on our drivers have never been greater. Against this backdrop Royal Mail Specialist Services and the CWU are serious about the safety of our drivers and other road users and are committed to making significant improvements in our road safety performance through a fresh approach to how we investigate and support drivers following an accident.

 

Key to this is the creation of an environment where development needs are identified with appropriate support and training provided to ensure that RMSS drivers are able to excel in the performance of their duties. The guiding principle behind these joint activities is one of improving driving standards and “Keeping Our Drivers Driving” and to this end the process is designed to provide clear guidance for managers dealing with accidents. The RTA Procedure will provide the tools and the opportunity to enable our drivers to improve their skills and address areas of concern in a supportive, non punitive environment.

 

The procedure focuses on the reporting of accidents, the investigation process, the deployment where necessary of appropriate training and the decision process on blameworthiness. The highest priority is to reduce and where possible prevent road traffic accidents through the adoption of appropriate training interventions and safe driving techniques for drivers.

 

This agreement does not seek to exclude the application of the Conduct Code where behaviours are a clear breach of the standards expected within the code. However, it is agreed that a mechanistic approach or trigger point based on the use of the conduct code is not appropriate as a means of managing road traffic accidents.  

 

Removal from driving may be appropriate in some instances; however this will only be considered in line with the process contained within this agreement and on the basis that the intention is preventative rather than punitive.

 

All cases will be assessed and dealt with according to the individual circumstances of the accident to identify the cause of the accident and to minimise the risk of reoccurrence.

 

A flow chart and model letters are included in the appendix to support the practical implementation and ongoing day to day use of this procedure.

 

Safe Driving Code of Practice

 

The RTA Procedure complements the Safe Driving Code of Practice which outlines the responsibilities of RMSS drivers and managers in ensuring the safety of themselves and others. Every driver and manager has a duty to uphold the standards outlined in this code.

 

Scope

 

The procedure applies to all current RMSS operational drivers and will be reviewed periodically. The aim is to ensure that a uniform procedure is applied throughout the business ensuring that every RMSS employee is treated fairly, the case fully investigated and dealt with promptly.  

 

Reporting Process

 

Managers should commence the reporting and investigation process in a prompt manner, and with completion normally within seven days

 

Following a Road Traffic Accident (RTA), the driver must inform their Line Manager as soon as possible, to ensure ERICA is completed within 24 hrs. The completed ERICA must be forwarded to the Accident Management Centre (AMC).

 

Following the reporting of an accident, Royal Mail Specialist Services managers have a primary responsibility to ensure the welfare of the driver including in more serious cases the recovery of the driver and vehicle. When an accident involves injury to the driver, the relevant local CWU IR and Regional Health and Safety Representatives should also be notified at the earliest opportunity.

 

This procedure is in line with the normal process of notifying Health and Safety Representatives of accidents on duty

 

After a serious accident, irrespective of blameworthiness, a driver may suffer trauma. This may manifest itself immediately after the incident, or the effects may be delayed. If a manager becomes aware, or suspects that a driver may be suffering from trauma, he/she should be offered the services of our Occupational Health team at the first available opportunity. Where a RMSS driver has been involved in a fatal accident the services of our Occupational Health team

should be made available to him/her immediately, and their advice sought on the driver’s fitness to return to work or driving duty.

 

 

Post-Accident Investigation

 

Initial discussion

 

The investigating manager should meet the driver within 24 hours of any road traffic accident, the manager will ask for a preliminary verbal account of the circumstances relating to the accident to enable a basic assessment and to establish the facts.

The purpose of this is to:

 

➢ Check/ensure the welfare of the driver and arrange appropriate support where necessary.

➢ Fully explain the investigation process to the driver.

➢ Explain to the driver that it is their legal responsibility to notify their private insurance provider if they have any RTA’s whilst driving for work regardless of fault. Failure to do so may invalidate their private insurance.

➢ Hand the driver a copy of the insurance letter and the Driver Statement Form which should be completed and returned within the 24 hour period. This should ensure that the driver is able to provide a full account of the accident while the events are fresh. However it is recognised that accidents can be stressful and exceptional circumstances may arise where a driver may request more time to complete the necessary reports, and this would not normally be refused.

 

If the line manager suspects an underlying medical condition contributed to the accident, professional advice should be sought from our Occupational Heath team immediately.

 

The vehicle must be presented to a Fleet and Maintenance Services (F&MS) Service Centre at the earliest opportunity for inspection with a PFMT1 (vehicle fault report form). This will enable identification of any vehicle faults which may have contributed to the accident.

 

Route/Site Hazard Review

 

From this initial account the investigating manager should consider whether the investigation would be enhanced by a visit to the scene of the accident to assess whether there are remaining hazards which could present an ongoing risk to other RMSS drivers. In circumstances where an accident involves serious injury to any person or major damage to property (including vehicles) or when the police are involved, a manager should always perform a Route/Site Hazard review where it is safe and practical to do so. In the case of a fatal accident, reporting processes relating to the Fatal Accident Procedure shall apply.

 

The investigating manager should also check on the Driver Risk Assessment (DRA) status of the driver and if this has not been completed, arrangements will be made to facilitate the completion of the DRA on-line profile within 14 days of the accident.

 

Precautionary Removal from Driving Duties

 

In the event of an accident being categorised as serious as defined below consideration may be given to a precautionary removal from driving pending completion of the investigation, depending on the nature of the accident this may involve temporary re-assignment to a non driving duty or precautionary suspension.

 

On this basis such action should only be taken in appropriate circumstances in order to protect the safety of employees, other road users and the general public. The driver may also request temporary reassignment to non driving duties (see below). The decision should be communicated to the driver on a face to face basis.

 

Full consideration will be given to the individual’s earnings and attendance patterns during the period of removal from driving. Wherever possible, a non driving duty will be allocated with attendance hours similar to that of the duty the individual was previously performing, however it may be necessary to consider alternative attendance patterns. A degree of flexibility is expected from both parties in these circumstances. In such cases this will be discussed with the driver with full account taken of any relevant personal circumstances. In all cases, the individuals pay and assigned allowances will continue to be paid during the period of the investigation.

 

Serious Road Traffic Accidents

 

A road traffic accident should be considered serious if it causes:

 

➢ Fatal or serious injury to any person(s) involved in the accident.

➢ Major damage to property (including vehicles).

 

and/or as a consequence of the Royal Mail Specialist Services driver:

 

➢ Failing to observe or comply with mandatory sections of the Highway Code.

➢ Driving in a dangerous and/or negligent manner.

➢ Driving whilst under the influence of drink or drugs (including prescribed medicines).

 

Reinstatement Following Precautionary Removal From Driving

 

When a driver has been precautionary removed from driving and has not been found blameworthy they will normally be reinstated to driving duties at the conclusion of the investigation.  

 

Where the outcome of the investigation has recommended one or more training interventions, reinstatement will be enacted once the action plan/interventions have been successfully completed and performance restored.  

 

Precautionary removal from driving for prolonged periods should be avoided and managers should prioritise the allocation of training interventions ensuring timely deployment.

 

Temporary Reassignment – Drivers Request

 

It is recognised that involvement in a road traffic accident can be a traumatic experience. As such a temporary reassignment from driving will be deemed appropriate where the driver believes that they have been adversely affected by the incident and requests not to drive. In such instances the removal from driving will be reviewed after 24 hours and at intervals of 24 hours thereafter.

 

Where an individuals’ request not to drive exceeds 48 hours, professional advice will be sought from our Occupational Health team with appropriate support and counselling provided where necessary. In circumstances where a driver’s request was the sole reason for precautionary removal from driving, the individual will normally be restored to driving duties on request.

 

Where a driver requests long term reassignment from driving duties, cases will be dealt with in line with the appropriate agreed resourcing process.  

 

Formal Investigation Process – Fact Finding Interview

 

Once the initial investigation and Driver Statement has been completed and returned the driver will be invited to a Formal Fact Finding interview. This will normally be held within two days, subject to the complexity of the initial accident investigation. This meeting will be to review all documentation, provide an opportunity for further clarification and raise any mitigating evidence before any decisions are made.

 

At this meeting the driver may be accompanied by their CWU Rep or a work colleague from within the Royal Mail Group. Appropriate release from duty will be arranged to allow the driver to properly prepare and participate in the fact finding interview.

 

Full opportunity will be given to the driver at the fact finding stage to raise extenuating circumstances, contributory factors and points of mitigation.  

 

Following the Fact Finding Interview the manager will consider all available evidence. This should include:

➢ Completed Driver Statement.

➢ Outputs from Route/Site Hazard Review where appropriate.

➢ 3rd Party Statements, where appropriate.

➢ F&MS Vehicle Condition Report.

➢ Police Report, where appropriate.

➢ Witness Statements, where appropriate.

➢ Points raised by the driver or their representative at the Fact Finding Interview.

➢ Driver History.

 

All evidence will be considered in a fair and balanced manner. Following full consideration of all the available evidence a decision must be made by the investigating manager on whether the RMSS driver was at fault for the accident or not.  

 

Formal Investigation Process – Decision Meeting & Driver Interventions 1:1

 

The manager’s decision must be communicated to the driver face to face and in writing (using the appropriate model letters).  

 

The following outcomes are possible:

 

Not Blameworthy – The driver should be advised of the decision.

 

If after a full investigation, the line manager cannot decide who is to blame, the benefit of the doubt will be given to the RMSS driver.

Blameworthy – The driver should be advised of the decision.

 

It will be the responsibility of the manager to provide full detail of the rationale for the decision and any supporting information on which it relies. Copies of the full investigation report and decision must be sent to Lex Autolease.

 

As part of this decision meeting, the driver interventions 1-2-1 will take place to discuss what type of support or training is required and the appropriate next steps to be taken in line with the procedures detailed below.  

 

Where the Conduct Code procedure is applied in relation to the accident, the RTA Procedure should be suspended until the case is concluded. The formal fact finding interview will form the basis of evidence gathering for the Conduct Code. Following the conclusion of the conduct procedure, it may be that the RTA Procedure is re-visited for training/support purposes.

 

Blameworthy Decision- Appeal

 

The above investigation process is designed to ensure that investigating managers fully consider all available evidence and treat each case on the specific individual circumstances. As such the manager’s decision will normally be considered to be final.  

 

For those cases where conduct is inappropriate, the driver will be entitled to appeal the decision. For clarity this appeal will refer only to any decision on blameworthiness.

 

In the first instance any request for an appeal will be submitted in writing clearly outlining the reason for challenging the decision, e.g. the investigation has not taken into account all the available evidence. This should be done within three working days of communication of the blameworthy decision.

 

Where the driver appeals the case, papers will be passed to the manager hearing the appeal who will be at the next level of authority to where the decision was made.

 

The driver will be invited to a formal appeal hearing where they may be accompanied by their CWU representative or a work colleague from within the Royal Mail Group. All papers relating to the case(s) including witness statements, police reports, accident damage reports and possibly 3rd party statements, available from Lex Autolease (or Strata Solicitors acting on behalf of Lex) which the line manager used in making the decision will be made available to the employee at least 48 hours prior to the Review Meeting.

 

The outcome of the appeal should be communicated to the individual as soon as possible and normally within 5 working days. Where this timescale cannot be achieved the individual will be informed of the reason and the expected delay. The appeal decision will be sent to Lex Autolease (or Strata Solicitors acting on behalf of Lex) and the individual driver history updated as appropriate.

 

Post Investigation – Training Interventions

 

As described above, as part of the decision meeting, the driver and the investigating manager are required to have a Driver Interventions face-to-face meeting to discuss the investigation and agree an action plan and training intervention’s as appropriate.  

 

The key aim is to encourage and support individuals to attain the high standards of performance required of all drivers at all times. The primary emphasis is on positive encouragement through counselling, support and the effective application of appropriate training interventions. It is recognised that the approach to this aspect may vary depending on the type, frequency or severity of the accident. If a driver has been removed from driving pending investigation, then any intervention to support the driver, as a result of the face-to-face meeting should be planned in as part of driver development and completed as quickly as practicable.

 

At this meeting, the driver may be accompanied by their CWU Rep or a work colleague from within Royal Mail Group.

 

Single Blameworthy Accident (minor)

 

Based on the details and contributory factors of the accident the most effective intervention will be selected and agreed. Where managers require expert advice on specific training interventions, assistance may be sought from the Royal Mail Road Safety & Compliance Team.

 

Interventions need to be considered alongside the DRA profile and related to the type of accident that has occurred. An intervention does not necessarily take the form of a driving course or in-cab training.

 

The action plan must be signed by both driver and manager and must be completed within 42 days of the accident occurring. Once the relevant intervention has been completed a copy of the action plan and training file must be kept locally.

 

Multiple Blameworthy Accidents (2 or more minor)

 

Based on the details and contributory factors of the accident and the previous accident history the most effective intervention will be selected and agreed. Where managers require expert advice on specific training interventions, assistance may be sought from the Royal Mail Road Safety & Compliance Team.

 

The face-to-face meeting will review the nature of previous accidents; assess any similarities or patterns, and the appropriateness and effectiveness of previous training interventions. Where a number of similar minor accidents have occurred (i.e. reversing), appropriate in-cab training will be selected.

 

The action plan must be signed by both driver and manager and must be completed within 42 days of the accident occurring. Once the relevant intervention has been completed a copy of the action plan and training file must be kept locally.

 

Where a driver completes 24 months without a further accident, any further minor accident will be considered as a single accident.  

 

In cases where a number of accidents suggest an issue of capability despite the deployment of appropriate training interventions, including in-cab support, consideration will be given to removal from driving duties, in line with the terms of the Capability Procedure.

 

 

Serious Accident

 

Where a driver has been found blameworthy following a serious accident a risk analysis must be carried out to understand the dangers or risks of the driver remaining on driving duties.

 

In such circumstances consideration should be given to an external driving assessment prior to the face-to-face meeting. The outputs from the assessment will then be used to influence a review of available interventions which could restore performance. Based on the details and contributory factors of the serious accident the most effective intervention will be selected. Where managers require expert advice on specific training interventions, assistance may be sought from the Royal Mail Road Safety & Compliance Team.

 

Action plans must be signed by both driver and manager and must be completed within 42 days of the accident occurring. Once the relevant intervention has been completed a copy of the action plan and training file must be kept in the drivers file.

 

In cases where an assessment identifies serious driving flaws, appropriate consideration will be given to removal from driving.

 

Consideration of Removal From Driving

 

Through the prompt and consistent deployment and application of the RTA Procedure, removal from driving on a long term basis should only be considered where appropriate training interventions, including in-cab training have been implemented and performance has not been restored to an acceptable level.  

 

If it becomes necessary to consider the removal of an individual, due to capability, from driving duties this needs to be considered against the principles of the Road Traffic Accident Procedure.

 

Relevant Factors

Removal from driving on a long term basis should only be considered in cases where:

 

➢ After the completion of the range of appropriate interventions, expert advice suggests that the expected driving standards have not been achieved.  

➢ Where agreed training interventions relating to a previous accident have been completed and there are subsequent accidents of a similar nature.    

➢ Following a Serious Blameworthy Accident where an assessment identifies serious risks in allowing the individual to continue to perform driving duties.

➢ Where our Occupational Health team recommend removal on Health or Welfare grounds. (On occasion, the GP’s opinion may differ from that of the Occupational Health Service. For further advice, please contact the HR Advice Centre)

➢ Consideration has taken place of suitable non-driving duties or redeployment opportunities.

Where removal relates to Health or Welfare grounds, decisions will be subject to review where expert advice suggests a change in circumstances which would allow a return to driving duty.

 

 

Procedure To Be Followed

 

Invitation to interview

 

The line manager should invite the driver to a formal interview, giving 48 hours notice, to determine if he/she should be removed from driving. The driver may be accompanied by their CWU representative or a work colleague from within the Royal Mail Group. All relevant records from Lex Autolease (or Strata Solicitors acting on behalf of Lex), training interventions, and any independent expert advice will be made available to the individual before interview.

 

DECISION NOT TO REMOVE FROM DRIVING

 

If after interview the line manager decides removal from driving is not appropriate, the driver is advised of the decision.

 

Removal from driving

 

If after interview the line manager decides that removal from driving is appropriate, the driver is informed of the decision. The driver can then request an appeal against this decision. Any request for an appeal will be submitted in writing clearly outlining the reason for challenging the decision. The decision to appeal must be communicated within 3 working days of receipt of the letter. The line or office manager will have to make suitable alternative employment arrangements for the period of removal from driving.

 

When there is no appeal

 

If the driver does not request an appeal, the line manager should record the decision and keep locally.

 

Decision to appeal

 

If the driver appeals against removal from driving, the papers are passed to the manager hearing the appeal who will be out of the line at the next level of authority to where the decision was made. At the appeal hearing the individual may be accompanied by his/her trade union representative or work colleague from within Royal Mail. The appeal is a hearing at which the appropriate manager will re-hear the case in its entirety.

 

Outcome of appeal

 

The outcome of the appeal should be communicated to the individual as soon as possible and normally within 5 working days. Where this timescale cannot be achieved the individual will be informed of the reason and the expected delay. If the appeal is successful the individual is reinstated to driving duties and this decision communicated to him/her as soon as possible. A Driver face-to-face Interview should take place to select and agree the most appropriate training intervention.

 

If the appeal is unsuccessful this should be communicated face to face and in writing.

 

 

 

Redeployment

 

Where removal from driving duties is confirmed a full assessment will be made of redeployment positions across all Royal Mail Group sites within reasonable travelling distance in line with the terms of the Capability procedures, which may include alternative class driving. Royal Mail Specialist Services will aim to find the most suitable available non driving duty, taking into consideration issues such as location, attendance patterns, including any requirements relating to the Equality Act or family friendly commitments and opportunities to mitigate any potential loss of earnings. Full account should be taken of any personal hardship before a redeployment decision is taken.

 

In reviewing redeployment options a list of all available vacancies will be shared with the driver and their representative.

 

Return to Driving Duties

 

Under the terms of this procedure all drivers will have the opportunity to return to driving duties once evidence exists that acceptable performance has been restored.

 

Following a period of 12 months (or in exceptional circumstances 6 months) from the date of removal from driving duties all individuals will have the right to request consideration of a return to driving duties. Where redeployment has been to a position in Royal Mail individuals will have the ability to apply for driving duties in Royal Mail or Royal Mail Specialist Services. Due consideration will be given to this provided the individual:

➢ Is in possession of the appropriate valid driving licence.

➢ Is assessed as medically fit to drive, where appropriate.

➢ Is willing to undergo a driving re-assessment.

➢ Is willing to complete any appropriate training interventions to ensure the required standard is met relevant to the particular driving duties.

 

The above steps must be successfully completed prior to any return to driving duties. Where the assessment indicates that acceptable performance has been restored the driver will be eligible to apply for the next available driving duty in line with the appropriate agreed resourcing procedure. In such circumstances precedence will be given to the returning driver over external candidates.

 

Procedure For Dealing With Medical Or Welfare Problems

 

Referral to Occupational Health

 

If the line manager believes that the driver may have a medical or welfare problem, or the driver indicates that this may be the case precautionary removal from driving duties should be considered. The driver should be referred to our Occupational Health team. This should not delay the completion of ERICA.

 

 

 

 

 

Medical conditions: drivers’ responsibilities

 

Drivers should be advised that they have a personal responsibility for informing their line manager if they become aware of a medical condition that may affect their fitness to drive official vehicles.

 

Drivers should be made aware that under the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is a criminal offence to fail to notify the DVLA that they are suffering from a relevant disability or disease that may affect their ability to drive safely.

 

No medical and/or welfare problem

 

If our Occupational Health team confirm there is no problem, the driver should be informed accordingly and the remainder of the Road Traffic Accident Procedure followed. If the driver is currently removed from driving duties, the decision to allow a return to driving duties can be taken in conjunction with the blameworthy decision at the discretion of the line manager.

 

Medical and/or welfare problem

 

If a problem exists, and the decision has been made to remove the employee from driving, the decision should be communicated on a face to face basis (see model letter 13). The driver can request an appeal against this decision. The intention to appeal must be communicated within 3 working days of receipt of the letter. The decision should also be recorded in the driver’s personal file.

Alex Warner​Terry Pullinger

Managing Director​Assistant Secretary

Royal Mail Specialist Services (RMSS)​ ​CWU

 

 

Date: 20th March 2015

 

 

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑